Laserfiche WebLink
21 March 1996 <br /> Page 3. <br /> b&. Shennan reminded the Board of the precedent they would be setting to allow two <br /> sW ways dowry an embat nent, this. would be the second one. The first one is not <br /> inqnfing the marsh greatly but there is sparse vegetation under the, eNisting stairway and <br /> there is no reason to have two sW ays through which. light will find it difficult to <br /> penetrate and encourage growth on the coastal.bank. If the new stairway were permitted <br /> with a couple of steps, not on the nunh, but,just opposite to step down on the marsh, your <br /> would have no more impact on the marsh. <br /> A& Sanicki stated one access is elevated fmie feet over the high water line; this part is up <br /> off` the ground. There is a difference of grade of 23 feet Them is a 12 foot grade <br /> differential. One does not get you to the ground. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated they could put a step down. <br /> IW. Desrosiers Mated they would need three or four risers. 1r. Sanicki stated it is 8.5 deck <br /> cleation. They would be perpendicular. <br /> 1W. Sherman was concerned with the coastal bank, the sections under the stairway that are <br /> not rccer*m*M the amount of light as if the sta Tway was not there. <br /> fir. Green Mated the only problem is what the impact would be of removing this and <br /> instWfin another. The new stair goes down through here, four feet off the ground. Thi <br /> would be a disturbance removimg this and another putting in another stair. He felt there <br /> would be more darnage done by rippmng it out <br /> Public comment: none. <br /> �. Desrosiers asked if they would be willing to have codons stipulated that if the <br /> state way ever has to be replaced, that it not be put at that location but where the Agent has <br /> suggested, down from the side of the existing pier? �&. Sanicki had no problem with that. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to close pending Board of Appeals approval with the <br /> inclusion in the.Order of Conditions that if the existing stairway should ever have <br /> to be re la ed, that It be put why suggested by the Agent by a set of daim off <br /> to the side of the new pier ending apprroima#ely at the location of the new one. <br /> Unanimous vote. <br /> CLOSED PENDING, <br /> KENNETH NET I LIATSOS, 118 Shore Drive west, continued from 3/7/96- Mary <br /> LeBlanc presenting. The biding is beyond the loo foot setback. The coastal bank is an <br /> eroding unvegetat d bank. They propose to put down jute netting planted with beach <br />