Laserfiche WebLink
22 August 1996 <br /> Page 3. <br /> Ms Penn stated if already wed with the CCC, there would he no g for <br /> DCPC. Many of the same binds of issues would be applied to the projects <br /> when looking at them as DRI's. <br /> Mr. Desrosiers questioned the effect on homeowners requiring a Title V <br /> upgrade? Ms Penn stated it would prevent the issuance of permits during the <br /> first 45 day period. <br /> W. Fitzsimmons asked if the new Rivers Bill would give the Town enough <br /> authority without a DCPC? <br /> W. Sherman stated you have to assumeTitle v meets the standards. When <br /> a septic system is reviewed under the Act, the Commission is only judging <br /> hnpacts for construction and has no jurisdiction over the effluent. <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons asked who made the nomination in Falmouth? Ms Fenn <br /> advised it was the Conservation Commission by unanimous vote and it was <br /> endorsed by the Selectmen. <br /> Charles Borselli, resident, asked to give the Town a chance to clean up the <br /> River. <br /> The Chairman thanked everyone for coaxing. <br /> Ms Fenn stated if a question occurs afterwards, she would he glad to come <br /> hack and would be happy to help explore a nomination. <br /> 7:40 MEZ RE , INC., for a Determination of Appheability for removal <br /> of a dead tree, regrading and ung at Soo Nathan EHighway. Mar. <br /> Sherman was not ready to give a Negative Determination. The work is 80 <br /> feet from the P'W but them are signs of channelized erosion which will get <br /> worse if not staled. <br /> Public comments: Marie Scalley carne forward-to determine the exact <br /> location. It was in the area of Lot 57. She stated contaminated fill from <br /> septic system was dumped in that area. She has photos of this. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to find a positive determination unless <br /> the applicant agrees to a continuation on 5 September 1996. <br /> CONTINUED TO 5 SEPTEMBER 1996 AT 7:10 P.M. <br />