Laserfiche WebLink
22 August 1996 <br /> Page 7. <br /> An average of 12 inches of loam,was brought to the site and moved around. <br /> fir. Sherman stated it wiH be restricted to 10%, it assures under the worst <br /> case scenario it would be 1 ppm. <br /> Mr. began stated a lot of the site had natural lawn. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the rest of the area would have to remain in the natural <br /> state and left to grow into natural vegetation or clover could be planted. <br /> fir. Regan an stated it is a 30,000 st lot you are talking about 3,000 s.f.; he has � <br /> problem with that. This was created by someone who did cranberry <br /> arming. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked Mr.- Regan if it makes sense to get together with the <br /> Agent and delineate the lawn? <br /> W. Sherman stated it was Mr. egan's request that stimulated the <br /> Commission's policy. He gave a copy of the policy to the Secretary and to Mr. <br /> Regan and read it,into the record. <br /> Mr. Regan stated the area being talked about is not in the flood zone. He is In <br /> Catch 22 if you look at the reality or lack of its closeness to real resources. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the hearing could be closed and the Order issued without <br /> another formal hearing. <br /> W. Regan stated that a cranberry hog is being discussed and it has caused <br /> him a great deal of problems. He stated he is very disappointed and feels the <br /> Commission is interfering with his personal property rights. <br /> Mr. Sherman suggested continuing for two weeks. <br /> Publiccomments: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing. <br /> CONTINUED TO SEP MRk 1956 AT 8:10 PAS <br /> 8:351 ARSHAG MERGUERIAN for a Determination of Applicability on a <br /> request for replacement of a wood garden retaining wall with precast cement <br /> blocks in the same footprint at 14 Mutiny Way. Plans were sufficient. <br />