Laserfiche WebLink
Mar h 1997 <br /> 'age 4. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg: I move that we deny the application. <br /> Mr. Dsrsiers: Without Prejudice? <br /> Ms 'I'errio: Yes. <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons: Then we'd just start all over again. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg* Well, no, what Harry is pointing out is if we deny the <br /> application, unless we do it without prejudice, he can't come back. Is that <br /> right Harry <br /> Mr. esrosiers: I think so. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg: That is the question we want to do, I was being very generous <br /> but to not even give us a eaU and tell us.... <br /> Mr. esrosiers: If he can prove he can downscale the house and satisfy all the <br /> neighbors and everything else....... <br /> Mr. Rosenberg: I'm talking about both the applicant and the representative, <br /> to not show up and not bother to call us. <br /> 1r. Sharpe: It's denied. We didn't vote on it but..... <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons: We have a discussion period. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg: Let's leave the prejudice question out. Let hien come in and <br /> ask for an amendment on the denial to do it without prejudice. I have some <br /> feeling about the whole situation here and our nese being rubbed in this more <br /> than once. My notion is that we deny the application. <br /> Mr. Sharpe: Second. <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons: Any further comment on the motion? That not being the <br /> case I will call for a vete, all those in favor say aye. <br /> The Vote was unanimous and the notion carried. <br /> DENIED <br />