Laserfiche WebLink
April 199' <br /> 'age 1.1.. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it could be granted, in areas where currently lower than <br /> feet, that it can be maintained at that height. <br /> Public comments: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to close pending DEP number, have a <br /> site visit to give consideration to a lower height where it had been <br /> previously maintained at a lower height and the Commission will <br /> not change the policy of when the work can be done. <br /> Unanimous Note. <br /> CLOSED PENDING. <br /> Glaser: The Agent advised he spoke with Gregor McGregor who stated if <br /> they come in With a new plan, the Commission cannot turn them down. There <br /> is no case law to uphold it. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg suggested making Mr. Grotke file a request to get on the <br /> schedule and advertise and notify on a reconsideration of the Commission's <br /> denial. <br /> Mr. Sharpe felt they should start afl over from day one. <br /> fir. Rosenberg read from the minutes. <br /> Mr. De rosiers stated he is open to discussion. <br /> The letter from Michael Grot ke was read. A 21 day waiver was received. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the simplest ging- is to allow hire to renotify the <br /> abutters, revertise and reopen it. He can also be made to start over with <br /> an aH new ung. <br /> Mr. Desrosiers noted W. trot ke's letter was not copied to his client. He <br /> requested a letter be placed.in fir. Grotzke's file that this is the last time the <br /> Commission will tolerate his slip-shod wings, He brings plans in at the lasts <br /> minute. If he cones in with a changed plan that we have asked to have dome, <br /> that is not a problem. <br /> Mr. Sharpe took issue with the sentence in the letter, 0.. Tour decision was <br /> prompted by my absence." <br />