My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/12/1997 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
6/12/1997 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2018 5:28:26 PM
Creation date
2/26/2018 1:52:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/12/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
F <br /> 12 June 1997 <br /> Page 8. <br /> Mr. Sherman put forth a concept for consideration, as opposed to ghat is <br /> likely a vote to deny, they could request a continuance to come back with <br /> another proposal. <br /> The Chairman stated he senses that the Commission will deny this <br /> application and asked Mr. Grotzke if he wished to take an alternative course <br /> of action? <br /> Mr. Sherman stated. ander Chapter 172 , Section, the Commission has the <br /> ability to require, in di#ficult situations like this, an independent evaluation <br /> which the applicant would pay for. He asked if the applicant would be wflEmg <br /> to pay for the Commission to approach ars objective independent traffic <br /> consultant to determine whether their contention is correct that they have to <br /> have all that space for a driveway because if a quaffed independent traffic <br /> consultant told the Commission that that configuration is necessary and there <br /> is no room to squeeze it, then there might be reason to rethink. <br /> The Chairman did not feel that is germane, the size of the building can be <br /> reduced, it is very clear. That is not in order. <br /> Mr. Grotzke appreciated the offer but declined. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to deny the application for Howard <br /> Glaser under the Mashpe Bylaw, approved under the State.. <br /> Unanimous Vote. <br /> BYLAW: DENIEDICHAPTER 131-40: APPROVED <br /> 8:20 CRAIG S. LYNCH to raze an existing dwelling, cottage, garage and shed and to <br /> construct a dwelling with associated driveway, u0ties, grading and landscaping and an <br /> upgraded septic system at 70 Popponesset Island Road. Array l Mer of LEC presenting <br /> with Atty. Carter. The project is to raze four emoting structures on the site and build one <br /> single farm dwelling. Top of bank was developed from IEP policy. Other resource <br /> areas are beach, salt marsh and a mmall portion of Mune. The Coastal Bank is vegetated <br /> sparsely with,juniper and bayberry. To protect the bank from sedimentation, haybales and <br /> r <br /> siltation screens are proposed. They will leave a naturally vegetated buffer area beyond the <br /> fimit of work; no lawn is proposed. <br /> Green questioned the six bedrooms proposed? fir. Sherman stated it meets <br /> requirements with the d� system. The Comnussion would need to know about the <br /> ferfilizer proposed for the flower beds; does that have less impact than a lawn's It was <br /> reported it will be low to no nitrogen. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.