My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/24/1997 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/24/1997 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2018 5:30:44 PM
Creation date
2/26/2018 1:55:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/24/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
recommendation to continue this natter pending further~ available <br /> information under advisement. Mr. Hamilton requested permission <br /> to include information into the record which is not presently <br /> stated in the Notice of Intent . He stated there are no changes <br /> in the drawings. <br /> The Chairman expressed his reluctance to dear any <br /> preliminary information which may significantly change the final <br /> application. <br /> Kathleen stated that Mr. Hamilton has been made very aware <br /> of the situation. The Agent has requested input from Coastal <br /> Zone Management in this matter. The Agent and Kathleen have <br /> inspected the site and feel very comfortable with the Plan as <br /> presented by Mr. Hamilton. There is a scheduled meeting with DEP <br /> for August 13th regarding beach nourishment issues, of which <br /> Triton way is included as part of the region of interest. <br /> Elliot Rosenberg stated this ratter could not be held <br /> indefinitely under the law, a decision is required to be made at <br /> this Hearing. Kathleen requested a continuation contingent upon <br /> Coastal zone Management review of the project. Elliot responded <br /> the Commission could not continue without the assent of the <br /> Applicant . <br /> Kathleen explained that the Agent has forwarded the Plan and <br /> Notice of Intent to Rebecca Haney, for her review/input . Elliot <br /> stated he would not be in favor of making a decision in this <br /> matter until DEP input has been received by the Commission. The <br /> Chairman was .inclined to agree with this statement. <br /> Mr. Hamilton explained the intent of the project is t <br /> repair three existing structures. The structures are in a state <br /> f disrepair due to deficiencies in design, scour and erosion <br /> problems, as well as beach face erosion. He proposed repairing <br /> the corner~ areas, which would benefit the tow area by covering <br /> less of the resource area. Design features include the sinking <br /> of tow stones four to five feet below the beach in order to <br /> prevent future tow problems . The concrete wall sect ions ar•e to <br /> be removed and replaced with a revetment . These proposals -are <br /> being made in an attempt to improve storm protection <br /> capabilities . With regards to preventing further beach erosion, <br /> Mr. Hamilton proposed adding sand on an annual basis; a large <br /> scale beach nourishment project to span one mile of the beach, to <br /> which the three current land owners Bovarnick! Nova off and <br /> Duncan) have agreed. The land owners would commit to replacing <br /> sand onto the beach that would average 300 cubic yards per year, <br /> per property, and to setting aside the funds necessary to do so, <br /> as well as becoming involved with a full scale beach nourishment <br /> project. - <br /> Kathleen <br /> roject.Kathleen inquired as to both the disposal of the structure, <br /> and access. Mr. Hamilton replied the contractor would be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.