Laserfiche WebLink
December 1997 <br /> Page 5. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated there is one other issue, there is an existing water line <br /> going through the bank and there is no dock and asked it's purpose. Mr. <br /> Slavins y 'stated there are a couple of small piles as though there might have <br /> been a dock down the stairs. Mr. Sherman wanted to know what that is <br /> hooked up to so there won't be a rupture at some point. If not needed, it <br /> should be removed; if needed, it should be permitted. Mr. Slavins y will look <br /> into this. <br /> Public comment: Ione. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue to 8 January 1998 at <br /> 7:40 p.m. at the request of the applicant to address the verification <br /> of the number of bedrooms, ident ication of the new v s paved <br /> driveway that exists and,the Agent have a meeting onsite to <br /> address the trade-off of vegetated areas and a plan. <br /> Unanimous Note. <br /> HEARING CONTINUED TO 8 JANUARY 1998 AT 7:40 P.M. <br /> 8:99 JASON STONE to construct a single family dwelling, placement of <br /> utifities, septic system, driveway, landscaping and erosion controls at Great <br /> Oak Toad. Norman Hayes presenting with Jason Stone. A plan was <br /> reviewed., BVW was shown. The setback is 35 feet. The red line is the <br /> AC C. This is the southernmost lot and is 15,000 s.f. Bituminous concrete <br /> in the road restricts the lot; this was done when they did the layout for Great <br /> Neck Road in 1995. The lot was positioned as close to the road as possible and <br /> they are going to Board of Appeals for a ' easement for the old right of way. <br /> They need to get a variance from the 50 foot setback to the wetland. Mr. <br /> Sherman interjected that it should be clear he is taming about Zoning Board <br /> of Appeals statute. They also need a variance for the ACEC. They have been <br /> able to get a Fast system in here. Four bedrooms is allowed by the nitrogen <br /> calcs. A letter was subnititted to Jing Mahala re how the Mate is interpreting <br /> the ACE C line. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked Mrs. Terrio to explain the concept. Mrs. Teruo was <br /> unable to locate the letter Brom Michael Stroman of DEP. <br /> Mr. Hayes did not know whether that letter was being enforced. Mrs. Terrio <br /> stated there can be no adverse effects within the ACEC. <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons mons stated the burden of proof is upon the applicant to prove <br /> that there is no adverse effects. Mr. Sherman stated no adverse effects for a <br /> resource area within the ACEC. The performance standards, according to the <br />