Laserfiche WebLink
22 January 1995 <br /> Page 2. <br /> Nir. Lumsden agreed, but asked if three months would make a huge <br /> difference? <br /> Steven BaH of the Watershed Management Committee asked that before the <br /> regulations are adopted they go before the Management Committee this <br /> coming Tuesday night. He 'would.tile therm to review then, <br /> Mr. Sherman asked if he was asg that they not be adopted ung after the <br /> Committee?s review He stated they could have been here tonight. <br /> Mr. Ball stated he is also on the Board of Health and they had no input on <br /> this regulation and did not even get a notice about this regulation. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it is posted and is in the office of the Town Clerk and <br /> Selectmen. There is nothing here that affects their jurisdiction whatsoever. <br /> Mr. Ball asked what harm there would be to let the Watershed Management <br /> Committee look at this; is that not part of why they were formed? <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it is an advisory committee and for the Comm ssion to <br /> not adopt a regulation until certain boards clear it......Mr. Ball stated, just <br /> postpone it. fir. Sherman stated he would life to act on there tonight, get <br /> them in palace, go before his heard and take suggestions. There is no reason <br /> why a hearing could not be held to modify therm. There are people coining in <br /> right now with livers Act questions and misinterpretations and conflicts in <br /> the way the language is written and he would life to get it cleared up. He <br /> offered to appear before that board, take they suggestions for revisions and <br /> any modifications could be made two weeks from now. <br /> Perry Alis asked for a rundown of the loopholes and reserved comment for <br /> after. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated when the livers Protection Act was adopted by the <br /> legislature, they wrote reqs that rewrote the whole Act. This was much to the <br /> consternation of MACC. They have exempted certain activities from review <br /> that used to require review: Unpaved pedestrian waways for private use, <br /> they dont say how big they are or how high they can be; fencing, if it will not <br /> constitute a barrier to wildlife movement, who makes that decision? Vista <br /> pruning, without review, the Commission would not know it is going on. <br />