10/15/1998 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

r 15 October 1998 Page 7. Mr. Sherman stated this can be discussed as neighbors, but it is not in the purview of the Commission. . Mr. Madsen Mated they had to be back 100' from there (the flood zone). Mr. Sherman stated there is no setback from the flood zone under the bylaw. There is no BVW upgradient on this lot. Ms Frappier stated there is an the adjacent lob. Mr. Sherman stated there may be a small fringe of BVW and suggested maybe the house could be pushed back but it cannot be justified an a view concept. Mr. Madsen asked if there is any reason why they could not have moved the house forward? i Mx. Rosenberg stated that is because of the top of the coastal bank; it is exactly 50'from the top of bank. Ms Frappier stated she will renotify abutters. VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 29 October 1998 at 8:00 p.m. at the request of the applicant. Unanimous Vote HEARING CONTINUED. 8:30 , DAVID BOVARNICK, EDWARD NOVAKOFF AND PAUL DUNCAN to amend the Order of Conditions for SE 43-1618 to permit pian revisions and a request for acknowledgment that sand used to improve access to the site will apply to the requirement for sand replenishment to the beach at 40, 46 and 52 Triton Way. Bob Hamilton presenting. They are seeking to reconstruct the revetment and seek approval of a revised plan with an improved design. The size and footprint is exactly the same. Eight property owners in a raw are looking to do the work together. The walls are failing. They have came before the Commission with a nourishment clause. Some have done it, some have not. There is a beach nourishment clause on their deeds. They have filed an ENF, not the scope of the ENR They are getting people together to move forward. There are two hurdles to solve and then it is hoped regional beach nourishment will came into fruition. They are asking that the sand for the access be credited to the nourishment.