My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/07/1999 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
01/07/1999 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2018 5:04:03 PM
Creation date
2/26/2018 2:42:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/07/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7 January 1999 <br /> Page 5. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it is not something to be discussed in the large sense <br /> because who awns what is not our burden. The best bet is to make a <br /> determination and let the lawyers thrash it out. <br /> Atty. Osol stated some people own other lots an this side as well. The road is <br /> a paper road. <br /> Atty. Conery stated every home has access to Monomoscoy Road within the <br /> exacting road which must be determined in land court. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated this burden goes beyond our abilities and the <br /> Commission could lacus a Negative Determination which can be appealed. <br /> Atty. Osol stated from their end be would ask that which ever war the <br /> Commission wants to rule an this, that they be quite specific an how they got <br /> to the ruling they have so that whichever side wants to appeal it, they can <br /> get some judge to say..... <br /> Mr. Sherman stated he will be as specific as this whale murky thing is. <br /> Atty. Conery stated from Mr. and Mrs. Saladyga at the end paint, (pointing) <br /> this house here, the whole proposed arca is their vegetated backyard so <br /> vegetation is an issue, never mind the species which are endangered. This is <br /> the only vegetation that exists on the second lot adjacent to Mr. Saladyga. <br /> Mr. Bernard stated they are not taking anyone's property and as far as their <br /> property, they are only moping a telephone pole. Atty. Conary stated not. <br /> according to the plan. � <br /> i <br /> Paiuxting to the pian, Mr. Bernard stated there is a telephone pole here and a <br /> fire hydrant here and then some rhododendrons and tress in hexa, that's <br /> what has to be moved so that he can get to his property. All they are doing is <br /> having the telephone moved so that they can get on the property without <br /> crossing the property of these people and using the road to get to their <br /> property. They are only taking down trees to get to that point. <br /> Atty. Conary stated that would be all of the trees. Mr. Bernard disagreed. <br /> Atty. Carvery asked how he was going to open the road? Mr. Bernard stated <br /> he is not opening 25 feet of road, only enough to get a carr by. <br /> Mx. Sherman recommended to the Commission that the hearing be continued <br /> for two weeks to allow him to check the relevance of these allegations as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.