4/22/1999 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

22 April 1999 Page 6. Board of Appeals and their attitude was that there was nothing they could do to grant a variance from ACC without some input from Conservation and need a memo that this is within the guidelines. Mr. Sherman stated he had a conversation with Jamie Regan and tela him this. They make the o' and there should be no problem tinder the local bylaw. Faxes from neighbors, Mark and Susana Gorstein were read into the record by the vice Chair. Mr. Slainsly stated they withdrew the variance request. Mr. Sherman stated some points in the letter are relative to some degree. He offered to communicate to the Board of Appeals that it would be better environmentally to leave some natural vegetated buffer but it cannot be required. The Notice of Intent per se did net specifically mention landscaping so none is approved at this time. The Chair suggested M's Lannik tale this up with the Architectural ,evie'w Committee as it is not the Commis ion's affair. Mr. Johansen noted the Notice does not mention ACEC. To be revised. Mr. Rosenberg stated the plan does not show it, but asked if the second story of the garage is going to be heated and usable? Mr. Slavins y stated he does not know where Ms Lannik is getting the two-story information. Mr. Sherman stated it will be conditioned four bedrooms and what is considered a bedroom. 11r. Slavinsy stated the board of Appeals did say to cut down the front of the house to the 30' setback,, which they dial. They did maintain the o' buffer. There is-a denitrifying system. Public comment: none. VOTE: Motion made and seconded to close pending Board of Appeals approval and correction of the reference to ACC added to the appropriate page of the Notice of Intent. Unanimous vote. CLOSED P NDING0 7:35 BRIAN D. CASEY to remove one pitch pine tree and to do pruning and thinning at 57 birch way.