Laserfiche WebLink
19 October 2000 <br /> Page 5. <br /> 7:25 CHARLES J. VI LAS to authorize portions of an existing licensed }pier, ramp, float and <br /> pilings not conforming to the license including a 3' extension to the timber pier, the re- <br /> configuration of the floats and the installation of timber pilings in Shoestring Bay at 71 <br /> Frog Pond close. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it is more than a 3' extension. The total length, including the float, is <br /> o' longer. The Harbormaster does not have a problem with it, nor does the Shellfish <br /> Warden. chapter 91 will not give their approval without our approval._ <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked if it should be re-advertised? Mr. Sherman stated someone could <br /> challenge this. He suggested a continuance to re-advertise with the correct length in <br /> the ad. <br /> Steven Silva of Holmes & McGrath advised the 3' refers-to the fast 3" of the pier. That is <br /> ghat needs to be licensed. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated, from the original plan, there were floats added. The pier was longer <br /> by more than " The Commission could order there to re-configure those floats as they <br /> were done illegally. There is no compelling reason to approve the three floats. It was <br /> noted the dashed line is the licensed location. He suggested a two week continuance <br /> and he will talk to the Shellfish warden to see if changes are needed. Mr. Silva stated <br /> there is a letter from the Shellfish warden that he has no problem with it. Mr.:Sherman <br /> stated the Shellfish warden is supposed to make comments on "Land under the Ocean", <br /> as well as "Shellfish". <br /> Public comment: Steve Rowan advised he ran into the Shellfish Warden and he stated it <br /> is better this war. <br /> r <br /> Brad Caffyn stated he was there when that statement was made. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the Commission could approve a dock of this length, but not all t <br /> hose components. They could make it with more walkway and less floats. <br /> The Shellfish warden arrived. Mr. Sherman asked if re-configuration was a problem? Mr. <br /> York stated it is not a problem for shellfish, there are none. 1t is not a big resource area. <br /> Up in the marsh them are mussels. This cloak gold not have an adverse effect. The <br /> . Chair asked if he-was aware of'the fact that thea are floats rather than a walkway to go <br /> out to the main float? No, he never got a copy of the plan. It was agreed this should <br /> be continued as Mr. York is not prepared to discuss this. <br /> The Chair stated this hearing must be continued.' <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 2 November 2000 at <br /> 7:35 p.m. at the request of the applicant. Unanimous Vote. <br /> HEARING CONTINUED. <br />