Laserfiche WebLink
14 December 2000 <br /> Page 3. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated that cannot be done through this FDA. If they want <br /> a lawn it will need fertilizer ilize i could be allowed, but through an Order <br /> of Conditions. He suggested changing the plan to shover a wild grass seed <br /> mix and get an approval to continue work. Then they can come back in <br /> with a Notice of Intent if they wart to change it to a more typical type <br /> lawn under the guidelines. Mr. Pence agreed;. he thought that was a <br /> reasonable approach. <br /> i <br /> Mr. Shea questioned going into .the 3 buffer. Mr. Sherman stated it is <br /> already disturbed and it is a safety issue. The house is there and it <br /> needs egress. When Mr. Gardner originally came to the Commission, <br /> these restrictions were not in place. <br /> Public comment: none. <br /> 'ISE: Motion made and seconded to find negative pending acceptance <br /> of a revised plan by the Agent or Assistant Agent. <br /> Unanimous Note. <br /> Mr. Pence advised Mr. Gardner has asked if they could square off the <br /> corner behind the garage and submit this revision with the other referred <br /> to. It would comic out ' only behind the garage. Mr. Sherman had n <br /> problem with that as they are getting further away from the wetland. <br /> The Commission agreed. <br /> NEGATIVE PENDING. <br /> 7:05 CHARLES HINCKLEY on a Request for Determination of <br /> Applicability on a proposed ' x 3 ' deck with sono tubes at 3 <br /> Whippoorwill will Circle. Stephen Laliberte represented Mr. Hinckley. Mr. <br /> Rosenberg stepped darn for this hearing; Mr. Shaw chaired this hearing. <br /> Ms B ret z stated it is within 100 feet ofthe flood plain. She <br /> recommended negative 3. <br /> Public comment: none. <br /> NOTE: Motion made and seconded to find negative. <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION. <br />