Laserfiche WebLink
January 2001 <br /> In her professional opinion, IIs for tos stated in spite of the fact that <br /> this project does not meet the Performance standards she just read, she <br /> would recominend the following, to allow, giving consideration to the <br /> amount of boating access that occurs here, to allow there to be a one <br /> more time dredging event to occur under an order of Conditions good for <br /> three years. In that order, she would recommend the following <br /> conditions: <br /> 1. To strongly recommend to the proponent that they investigate <br /> alternatives for future boating access to po ponesset Creel. <br /> 2. 'There should be a survey of the actual square footage of salt marsh <br /> and the location of salt marsh adjacent to it within 100' of the <br /> proposed dredge channel. <br /> 3. Conduct a post nourishment engineered plan with a 5o' apart cross- <br /> sectional surveys of nourished dune shoring slope ratios. This <br /> information should be submitted in writing to the Commission by <br /> May 30of 2001. <br /> . In order to provide some meaningful mitigation, the Commission will <br /> male the final determination as to the location of the dredge spoil <br /> material, with the assistance of CZM, IEP and ACOS. <br /> . The maximum width of the proposed- channel shall be reduced from <br /> 0' to a maximum width of 3 ' in order to avoid over-steeping of the <br /> landward side of the dune on popponesset-spit, as well as protect the <br /> marsh and revetment to the north of the Channel. <br /> . only compatible grain size sediment shall be allowed to be used for <br /> beach nourishment purposes and in a location approved by the <br /> Commission, or it's staff. <br /> At the conclusion of recommendations, the Chair called for questions <br /> from the Commission. <br /> Nis Moore asked if the first time this was ever dredged was in 1961 Mr. <br /> Hayes advised it was 1962. she asked how many times since that it has <br /> been dredged? Mr. Hayes stated -he knew r of three times but there right <br /> be more. she asked if his argument t is that because it has been dredged <br /> in the past, they should be allowed to continue to dredge in the future? <br /> Mr. Hayes stated his argument is that the Bay needs the flushing i <br /> order to remain as a viable ecosystem. Because it is maintenance <br />