My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/4/2001 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
1/4/2001 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2018 5:04:00 PM
Creation date
2/28/2018 1:06:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/04/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
January 2001 <br /> Page 13. <br /> put it on the Spit or anywhere in Mashpee. The Array Corps said they <br /> did not thinly we should put 1t on.a barge and haul 1t out to sea because <br /> they did not life what they saver there. That idea fell apart. some of the <br /> alternatives being proposed won't happen because of the soil samples in <br /> that area.. He would welcome, and would be willing to ,pay, to prove that <br /> you still can't dredge in Popponesset Bay in and around the northern tip. <br /> That is the only other area you can do it. He asked, what are the <br /> alternatives? Ms Boretos made some great points tonight about 1938 <br /> but from 1935 to 1962 the fact remains that Poneset Creek was the <br /> equivalent ofWollaston Beach, it was a muddy backwater that stunk. <br /> People do have the right to good water quality. <br /> Mr. Darrington stated the Harbormaster is in support and there is <br /> three pageo n ilation by Jim Hanks of the Waterways Commission, also <br /> in support. He asked for the Commission to bend on some of these <br /> issues and thanked there. <br /> Gerry Daly, with the Waterways Commission, asked Mr. Ellis concerning <br /> the comment about going down to 35', if that makes it essentially a one- <br /> way street? Mr. Ellis stated it does. He further stated the Commission is <br /> allowing theca to dredge one time, in the interest of safety, give then the <br /> o" channel. <br /> -reg smith, President of save the Bay, stated since Neter seabury was <br /> built in 1962 and the groins went in, we are there now and it cannot go <br /> back to a natural state. It is up to them to keep those channels dredged. <br /> An alternative would be very expensive. They are funding this <br /> themselves and not asking the town for funds. It is very important to <br /> the whole community. If it is allowed to deteriorate, it will have an effect <br /> on the whole New seabury area. It is not a big project when you look at <br /> what is happening in osterille. The amount of material that was moved <br /> is staggering. <br /> Nathan Berkowitz advised he was involved in securing donations for all <br /> of the above reasons. It is important this project get clone. He has a <br /> problem with the one-tine dredging. He would life the Board to keep an <br /> open mind arra would prefer not to have the one year condition hanging <br /> over their heads. The depth of the opening prohibits the seals from <br /> corning in. There are more year-round residents with larger houses <br /> being built and the effluent from the septicsystems; this needs to get <br /> flushed out. He hopes everyone can work together. <br /> Mr, Sherman agreed with Mr. Ellis that the 501 should be. allowed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.