Laserfiche WebLink
mitigation. Identification of the wetland line has been <br /> accurately identified. The proposed project is within the <br /> fifty foot setback regulation. Location of cutting on-site <br /> has been shown. Applicant is not responsible for any of the <br /> cutting, neighbors have indicated there have been several people <br /> maintaining this property over a period of t ire, Oxpanding <br /> across three 3 properties, and leads to the water. <br /> References were being made to a sketch of the revegetation <br /> plan. ms . Wilson suggested the use of smaller size plantings <br /> which could be planted with a post hole dagger, leaving the root <br /> mat in-tact and undisturbed and which would eliminate any erosion <br />' problems as the plantings grow up. <br /> four ft. foot path has been shown. The proposed house <br /> project includes a walk-out basement, with very 'little back yard <br /> area. The septic system is adjacent to the road., a nitrogen <br /> removal unit having been proposed. The primary leeching is <br /> located one hundred 10 o ft . ) feet from the wetland edge . An <br /> approximate nine ft . ) foot variance will be required for the <br /> reserve area. <br /> The vice Chairman suggested Construction of a section of <br /> split rail fencing at the fifty foot buffer line . <br /> Ms. Wilson having concluded her presentation, the Nice <br /> Chairman recognized Ross Terpo, abutter corner of Algonquin, who <br /> made reference to the pathway. <br /> Mr. Terpo acknowledged the fact that the Assistant <br /> Conservation Agent has informed him of the inherited violation on <br /> the property and of his ,replanting responsibilities . Title <br /> investigations are .being made through his attorney. <br /> r. . Terpo questioned the time frame expected for said <br /> plantings (August 31st . He stated that at the time he purchased <br /> .his property he was under the impression that the subject <br /> property had been considered to be unbuildable (1998) . <br /> The commission- clarified the property had never been <br /> identified as unbuild.able under zoning, and that the proposed <br /> project has been engineered to meet conformance. <br /> Mane Boretos clarified this natter to be a separate <br /> enforcement issue, whereby Applicant has agreed that whomever <br /> is responsible for the cutting h . areed to restore the <br /> portion on their property. (References were being made to 1r. <br /> Terpo' s property within jurisdiction in need of restoration. <br /> She also explained the time fume issue being that Applicant has <br /> Notice of Intent valid for three 3 gears; she feels Mr. Terpo <br /> should revegetate sooner than three gears time. <br /> Mr. Terpo denied responsibility for the cutting and <br /> -7- <br />