Laserfiche WebLink
challenged his responsibility to revegeta e. He stated he is <br /> away from the property for sixmonths every year. There is a <br /> year-round caretaker who resides across the street from the <br /> subject property who has never witnessed any mowing taking place. <br /> Diane Boretos stated there is no new vegetation growing up <br /> within the path area which is 'a proximately twenty ft. ) feet <br /> wide . The root system still exists,. indicating the area is being <br /> maintained mechanically. <br /> Ms . Boretos suggested Mr. Terpo contact her to schedule an <br /> on-site visit at which time she would be able to further advise <br /> regarding restoration; she reminded him that he had agreed t <br /> contact her after hearing from hi . attorney. <br /> The Nice Chairman determined the two property issues to be <br /> entirely separate matters . The- commission could not address M . <br /> Terpols concerns this evening; and that Applicant has agreed to <br /> install fencing in order to. prohibit access to the water. <br /> There being no further Commission or public comment, the <br /> vice Chairman entertained a motion. <br /> MOTION: Michael Talbot made a Motion to Close and Issue <br /> subject to construction of temporary split rail fencing at the <br /> pathway'; which Motion was seconded by Ralph Shaw and so voted <br /> unanimously. <br /> 7 : 35 Paul Kerrigan, 14 Oneida Avenue, a continuance from <br /> May 24, 2001. . <br /> Diane Boretos explained the- matter had been continued a <br /> A l i-cant was not. present at the previous meeting, nor did he <br /> have the turf report for presentation. Applicant is requesting <br /> a lawn area. <br /> soil test and report have since been completed with <br /> reference to the illegal lawn area and has suggested two <br /> additional site visits, as well as a Management Plan (PH and <br /> Nitrogen Testing) . <br /> Mr. Sherman reported a written request has been received <br /> from the Building Inspector asking the conservation commission t <br /> deny issuance of this matter as there are other occupancy mattes <br /> he would like to address . <br /> The Commission determined that in the event wetlands <br /> standards are net., the con fission has no choice but to issue; <br /> the Commission cannot act upon Building Code issues. <br /> Ms . Boretos recommended approval of the Amended order based <br /> upon the Report, with the 'condition that the Monitoring Plan as <br /> outlined in said Report must be adhered to for the next three <br />