Laserfiche WebLink
he had prepared the plan/landscape plan. The number of bedrooms <br /> has not been changed - four 4 . with reference to the landscape <br /> plan, he stated every effort had been made to include those <br /> plantings approved by the Conservation Commission. The planting <br /> density has also been shown on the plan, an attempt being made to <br /> naturally restore the area. <br /> Diane Boretos expressed her primary concern with the <br /> proposed project to be minimum set-back issues, being thirty-five <br /> (35 ft. ) feet. Although the majority of proposed plantings are <br /> native species, the larger benefit to wildlife habitat would be <br /> the thirty-five foot buffer area. <br /> There was discussion, references made to the size/shape of <br /> the lot, the possibility of obtaining a zoning variance, possible <br /> re-location of the house closer to the pond, notation was made o <br /> the increase in size of the proposed house with reference to the <br /> existing. <br /> Diane Boretos asked if It is the intention of the Applicant <br /> to obtain a -variance for Title V. Mr. Sanicki responded., "yes rl <br /> to the street line with reference to the leaching facility, not <br /> with reference to the distance of the dwelling. <br /> The Clerk informed the Commission of a "Plans not validif <br /> notation received from the Board of Health. 11Uncatena Road, <br /> plans submitted with variance request, however no perc tests <br /> witnessed. by Board of Health; engineered based pert test results <br /> on abutting lots, therefore plans not valid. " ]dated July 24th. <br /> Mr. Sanicki stated it is indicated on the plan there has <br /> been no successful perc test. He recognized the fact the soil <br /> testing has not been completed on this property. The plan is to <br /> be modified; the septic system may also be modified. 1#r. Sanicki <br /> cited the reason the soil testing has not been completed to be <br /> the existence of electrical underground wires. <br /> The Chairman expressed his concerns regarding the layout o <br /> the house as being proposed. <br /> Carole Moore inquired as to landscaping issues such as <br /> existing lawn area; the removal of lawnrosa rugosa as indicated <br /> on the plan; and the number of proposed plantings. <br /> The Chairman noted the existing lawn will be replaced by <br /> deck, and house structures; not additional plantings. He also <br /> expressed misgivings regarding Applications filed with the <br /> Commission proposing to exchange lawn area in order to construct <br /> dwellings nearer to the water. He further stated the Commission <br /> should only consider such proposals as extreme exceptions. <br /> 1r. Sanicki asked if the Commission would consider a <br /> proposal whereby the twenty-seven t. feet would be <br /> -5- <br />