Laserfiche WebLink
23 August 2001 <br /> Page 2. <br /> very large homes on Triton Way,, to move their houses back to meet the <br /> 35' minimum, with mitigation. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked, to be accurate about past performance and sta3n*ng <br /> consistent, is- that true when a house already existed and there was <br /> already incursion there? Ms Boretos cited an instance on Triton Way <br /> here they were 22' to the eche of the top of the bank. <br /> Mr. Talbot Mated there are houses that the Commission allowed in ars <br /> area that was already highly disturbed in exchange for significant <br /> mitigative plants. It was felt that in the long run that was better because <br /> ghat was there was so bad and was a pollution potential. <br /> Ms Boretos stated they are offering mitigation plantings on the side and <br /> front of the house that will not have much use for wildlife. <br /> The Chair stated he felt there is a certain obligation to a person who <br /> already has a house in place and is not encroaching further- to the BVW. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked if the top of bank is under- the deck? Mr. Sanicki <br /> stated it is along the edge of the deck. <br /> Mr. Shen' an Mated the house before went over the top of the bank. The <br /> biggest factor for consideration in a case like this is ghat was there <br /> before, ghat is proposed now and how much of a plus or minus the new <br /> vegetation plan presents compared to the old one. <br /> Mr. Barrick advised ' was cut off across the entire house from the <br /> previous plan. -Mr. Sherman-stated the old drawing did not shot BST <br /> as the new drawing does, so it is comparing apples to oranges. From the <br /> edge of the pond, the old house was 2 . If we go to 35 and keep It <br /> roughly parallel, thea in that 3 ' orae for the old house there is a triangle <br /> with a height of ' and a base of about 2 ', 100 square feet in the 35' <br /> zone. Now there is a triangle of lo' x 0', 250 square feet, and more <br /> structure in the 3 than before. Is the mitigation adequate for that <br /> structure, compared to ghat was there before? He thought there could <br /> be adequate mitigation done if there was no more than before in that <br /> zone. <br /> The chair Mated itis 27"to the pond. Ms Boretos.stated it is 22' to the <br /> BVW r <br />