Laserfiche WebLink
mx-. Sherman asked if materials would be removed according to <br /> the original profile. <br /> Mr.. Force 1 l i responded, "Yes" . He then spoke to references <br /> made by the Assistant Conservation Agent at the time of the on- <br /> site with Argy Corps and C2M, and which had not been addressed at <br /> the Conservation Hearing. Microphetic algae exists along the <br /> coastline and the Assistant Agent expressed concern that it would <br /> become buried. However, the project could not be considered a <br /> beach nourishment as it would remain only temporarily, a few days <br /> at most . <br /> At this point Mr. Sheeran recommended approval on behalf of <br /> the Assistant Conservation Agent and himself . <br /> There being no further Commission or public comment, Mr. <br /> Shaw entertained a motion. <br /> MOTION: Michael Talbot made a Motion to approve the Amended <br /> Order; which Motion was seconded by Carole Moore and so voted <br /> unanimously. <br /> 7 : 35 151 Nominee Trust, 400 Nathan Ellis Hwy. , a continuance <br /> from September 6, 2001 . <br /> Mr. Shaw recognized John Sl avinsky, Cape & Islands <br /> Engineering, representing Applicant, who explained the reason for <br /> continuance had been due to the inability to meet the thirty-five <br /> foot setback. <br /> Mr. Slavinsky provided a plan stating Applicant has <br /> replicated a wetland. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked for clarification, stating an order has <br /> already been issued for this parcel of land. (There was some <br /> confusion as to owners/parcel/filings) . He asked Mr. Slavinsky <br /> if he had a copy of the plan originally approved for this parcel, <br /> stating he would like to compare the plans in order to make a <br /> determination as to the parcel under discussion. <br /> Mr. Sherman suggested the matter be held open for two weeks, <br /> as an approval has been grated contingent upon completion of <br /> said work; and to allow time for comparison of the plans. <br /> There being no further Commission or public comment, Mr. <br /> Shaw entertained a motion. <br /> MOTION- Michael Talbot made a Motion to continue discussion <br /> of the subject matter of this Hearing to the October~ 4, 2001 <br /> Meeting, at p.m. , at Applicant' s request; which Motion was <br /> seconded by Carole Moore and so noted unanimously. <br /> 7 :40 Paul Sugarman, 88 Tide Run, continued from. September 6, <br /> 2001. -7- <br />