Laserfiche WebLink
prodded copies of the Sunnar'y/Report, requesting consultants for <br /> the Town review prior to issuance. <br /> to Marjorie B. Lipkin to amend the order of Conditions for <br /> S -2036 to redesign pool and deck area at 63 waterline Drive <br /> South, Assessors Map 120, Block 143 . <br /> The Chairman recognized Jae Harvey, representing Applicant, <br /> who explained the proposed project. <br /> Proposed work is to take place within the original limit of <br /> work, although it is slightly larger than the original <br /> configuration. <br /> The Commission requested the approximate one foot <br /> encroachment of the wall into the drainage easement he removed, <br /> rewiring an amended plan indicating such. <br /> AS there is no change to the work limit, Mr. Sherman <br /> recommended approval . <br /> There being no further Commission or public comment, the <br /> Chairman entertained a motion. <br /> MOTION: Carole Moore rade a Motion to approval the amended <br /> Order of Conditions subject to submission of a reprised plan <br /> indicating the wall has been moved out of the easement area; <br /> which Motion was seconded by Elliot Rosenberg and so voted <br /> unanimously. <br /> 7 : 15 Joseph E. Halley, Determination of Applicability for a <br /> deck addition at 9 Tuspaquin Road, Assessors Map 72, Block 8 . <br /> Mr. Sherman explained this matter to be an after-the-fact <br /> deck addition, it has yet to be determined if the proper fees <br /> have been paid. It is approvable under the Act; under the By-la <br /> it does move -closer to the resource area. Due to the shape of <br /> the lot there is not much space for mitigation. Where is some <br /> room along what appears to be the lot line for the planting of <br /> additional shrubs .which would he satisfactory. <br /> The Chairman recognized Gerry Schultz, abutter, who raised <br /> objections to the proposal stating the plan is improper, the deck <br /> has been extended! fences have been erected and Applicant has <br /> encroached onto his property. <br /> The Commission informed Mr. Schultz they could not address <br /> zoning issues. <br /> Elliot Rosenberg clarified that in the event the dwelling <br /> differs from that plan which is on file with the Building <br /> Department, the issue should be addressed by the Building <br /> Inspector. <br /> -2- <br /> 4 <br /> i <br />