Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> cause hearing is held before the Commission. This allows the route of a criminal complaint, <br /> rather than civil. <br /> Len asked why not fine there now, rather then give them another chance? <br /> Peggy explained the first enforcement order was non specific , this will clean it up,and provide <br /> for a short time frame to comply. <br /> Also, there is a private sale going on so there needs to be a short turn around time to issue order <br /> for recording. <br /> Elliot asked if an enforcement order can be recorded? <br /> Peggy explained they need to seep town council advise on that questions but do not have an <br /> answer yet. <br /> John made a motion to issue an enforcement order for 212 wheeler Road for <br /> unpermitted cutting of trees and shrubs on a bank; unpern tied clearing of vegetation <br /> on a bank; failure to comply with Enforcement order issued on Sept. 5, 2001 for <br /> alterations on a bank,with stipulations as explained by staff Stephanie seconded the <br /> motion. All members were in favor <br /> 7:15 Bateman.Builders, 17 Canochet Ave (clearing within the 100 ft buffer area to allow for <br /> house construction. <br /> Dave San.icki,was present representing Mr. Bateman and presented the plan to Commission <br /> members. <br /> This is a 5000 sq foot lot. heed to clear within the loo foot buffer for house construction. will <br /> install a silt fence for mitigation during construction. He showed the area on the plan; it is a <br /> small area within the buffer.. <br /> Peggy explained staff sees no impact to the resource area. However, the town treasurer notified <br /> her there is over clue taxes on this property and the permit will need to be held until taxes are <br /> paid. <br /> There was not public convent. <br /> Len made a motion to vote ANegative 3 (work in buffer with no impact)with <br /> stipulation that it be held until payment of back taxes. Stephanie seconded the rntion. <br /> All members were in favor <br /> :20 Michael Cranfield, 91 Monmoy Rd west (seek permit of existing pier ramp float and <br /> bulkhead with maintenance in perpetuity) <br /> Mr. Cranfield was present. He has owned the property for 20 year and for at least 3 Dyers there <br /> has been a .existing pier, bulkhead and clod. He sough amnesty in 1991, was issued a number <br /> by the Mate but never followed through with the paperwork, it beca-rne too cumbersome, He is <br /> now seeping to continue with that Process. <br /> He pointed out an error, is asking for maintenance in perpetuity but it i -a 3 oyear license so the <br /> language"maintenance in perpetuity"will be removed. He had a sketch, not a plan, of the doer. <br /> Diane spore with Mr. Granfield and hitch Ziencina, DEP. He has the right to use his late filing <br /> for the mnesty program and file a RDA,.dust to bring it into compliance. The RDA cannot be <br /> conditioned however, therefore, he cannot do any more additional work to the doer. <br /> If he wants to do more work, he will need to file a notice of intent. <br /> Mr. Cranfield said he is not going to do any work, <br /> Diane said that is different that what he previously told her. Mr. Granfield said he address that <br />