My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/22/2003 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
5/22/2003 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 5:16:09 PM
Creation date
3/2/2018 2:11:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/22/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7:20 p.m., John 1 eardo ,, BBB Great Neck Road South (construct fence). Bob <br /> recommended approval with the stipulation that the fence be one foot above the <br /> ground. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the plan with the <br /> condition that the fence be one foot above the ground. <br /> 7:25 . ., save Popponesset Bay, Popponesset Creek and Spit (continued from <br /> 5/8/03). Representing the applicant was Norman Hayes, BSc. <br /> Mr. Hayes said Bob has spoken with Jim O'Connell, who opined that the performance <br /> standards for managing the dredging of this barrier could not be met. Mr. Hayes said <br /> they never said they thought that it could, and he was here to give another update on <br /> the project prior to any decision. I.e., they have outstanding permits from the Array <br /> Corps of Engineers to 2007, a Water Quality Certification for dredging 9,000 cubic <br /> yards to 2008, and a Chapter 91 Department of Wetlands and Waterways permit <br /> through 2006. <br /> They also recently received a DEP file number which states that if this project goes <br /> forward, they must rake sure that the beach nourishment is compatible with what is <br /> already existing on the beach. The beach nourishment area is licensed under an <br /> existing permit granted to the Town of Mashpee for beach fronts on Nantucket Sound to <br /> 2007. The land under which the work would be done would be land of the <br /> Commonwealth of Massachusetts below the mean water mark as done before. Also in <br /> the /Notice of Intent is the removal of pipes and concrete piers with rebrs from the <br /> shore front of the Spit. <br /> They are still asking for an approval, but they can't disagree with Bob's assumption that <br /> it is impossible to meet all the performance standards here because it's a unique <br /> barrier. It's pinned by a large jetty, its drifted from its migration by a revetment on the <br /> south side of Popponesset Island. it's also pinned from northeast migration because <br /> j there had been revetments, and nine storms have breached it, and it's now starting to <br /> migrate more in a northeasterly direction towards the sound of Popponesset Bay. <br /> This is a unique situation where man-made events: not the least of which was the <br /> 160,000 cubic yards of dredging in 1962, have altered the situation where they can't <br /> meet the standards. The Army Corps of Engineers has conditioned their permit that <br /> Save Popponesset Bay would develop a harrier beach management plan to address <br /> these issues. <br /> Bob does not disagree vith the above, but it does not obviate the tact that the dredging <br /> portion of the project does not meet performance standards. We reflect those same <br /> standards in our own chapter 172By-laws. Bob has prepared a discussion of these <br /> issues, which he didn't go into detail because it's a repetition of the performance <br /> standards. He said that Jim o#Connell concurs that our hands are tied With the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.