Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> i <br /> 7:18 p.m. Chilton Development, N I—166 Waterway <br /> (Demolish and rebuild new single family home with driveway, landscaping, retaining galls, pool, <br /> patio, spa,walkways, irrigation, re-grading, denitrifying septic system,mitigation plantings and <br /> associated appurten noes) c ntinued from 08107108) <br /> (Cass Costa recuses herself)(c rrnmissi ner Fitzsimmons calls the Rules of Necessity) <br /> Torte Bunker from BSS Design stood to represent the applicants. Mr. Bunker described the applicants <br /> wish to demolish.the existing house and rebuild a new home that is only slightly larger and where the <br /> garage would be setback further on the property. Mr. Bunker described the applicants wiser to demolish <br /> the existing house and rebuild a new home that is only slightly larger and where the garage would be <br /> setback further on the property. Mr. Bunker further explained that a new denitrifying septic system would <br /> be installed and would be set to meet the 100 foot setbacks from Balt Marsh, currently the system is not <br /> in cornpliance. Mr. Bunker explained that drain inlets will also be added to the property and piped toward <br /> the leeching field to control runoff. Mr. Bunker stated that he felt the new plans were ars improvement to <br /> the site. The Assistant Agent explained that the Conservation Department did have some concerns about <br /> erosion on the site due to the steep bank. The Assistant Agent explained that they would like to see <br /> staked hay bales and a silt fence added to make sure nothing goes down the bank. The Assistant Agent <br /> also explained that they would like to see hay bales around the leeching pit and hay bales installed <br /> around the tree marked for removal. Mr. Bunker agreed to add the hay bales and silt fence. The Agent <br /> explained that he was happy to see some of the suggestions made after the initial onsite added to the <br /> new plan. The Agent and Assistant Agent stated that they did not want to see any marsh elder disturbed <br /> and that the applicant would need to contact conservation prior to any mowing of the Phragmites. The <br /> Agent also requested that the department be notified prior to the application of any herbicide. <br /> Commissioner Fitzsimmons questioned whether conservation had to be concerned with the side setback <br /> being only 10 feet;the Agent explained that it was out of Conservation jurisdiction. Commissioner Allem <br /> questioned if there was going to be a baffler added to the blower due to the proximity to the neighbors. <br /> Mr. Bunker stated that he could add one if necessary. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to close and Issue with the restrictions <br /> outlined. <br /> 7:21 p.m. Christopher Joe, RDA—43 Monahansett load <br /> (construct a 5—foot patio) <br /> The applicant Mr. Chd topher Joe stood to address the Commission. Mr. Joe explained that he had been <br /> at the previous hearing to have some shrubbery permitted and was novo looking to add a patio to his <br /> property. Mr. Joe explained that the patio would be installed where a deck previously stood and that it <br /> would be circular. Mr. Joe explained that he would like to use pavers like that used in his walkway but that <br /> he had alternatives as well if the Agent or Commission were worried about run off. The Agent explained <br /> that if the pavers were placed correctly in the area and laid over the correct material they would be fine for <br /> use. The Agent explained that he did not want to see there set in hard packed sand. The Agent explained <br /> to the Commission that patio would be installed in disturbed lawn area and that no vegetation would have <br /> to be removed. The Agent did request that Mr. Joe use natural mulch, free from dolor and asked if there <br /> would be more shrubbery added for the project. Mr. Joe explained that the war the shrubbery will be laid <br /> will not require anymore to accomplish the same thing. Mr. Joe asked if the Agent warted to see more <br /> spacing for the patio pagers than exists on the pavers on the walkway. The Agent did request that they be <br /> placed farther apart to allow for more drainage and recommended a negative determination. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carved for a Negative Determination. <br /> 7:24 p.m. Paul Valentine, ICDA—Wakeby Pond <br /> (Continued from 08121/2008)(Replace existing seasonal dodo structure) <br /> It was read for the record that the applicant requested a two-week continuance until 10102108 a@ 7:15 p.m. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a continuance until 10/02108 a@ 7*15 p.m. <br /> 4 <br />