Laserfiche WebLink
(1) there will be a need of some Lind of erosion control and 2 an onsite consult before the work <br /> commence but after the silt fence i in place. He also asks Mr. Croft what the rnechani rn i s for <br /> removal of the old pavement and Mr. croft responds that they will be using a Grade-All which has <br /> an asphalt removing bucket that is <br /> very confined and self contained. The bridge has a wooden' <br /> deck underneath the asphalt so there will be a means for emergency vehicles. Mr. Gurnee asks if <br /> there will be any re-grading and IIIb. Croft explains that there will be a little re-grading at both <br /> approaches to match everything up. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination , <br /> 7:09 c twit Bay condos SE 43-2496(418 Quinaquisset Ave.) Add perpetuity to ooe for invasive <br /> vires —AOC <br /> Resource Area Inland Bank <br /> Material submitted., Plan Piot Plan (highlighted ares) <br /> Michael DlNoia, the site manager for Cotuit Bay-Condos is present and he states that they recently <br /> had approval for vista pruning but the invasive vines (from previous Nol) have grown back pretty <br /> ferociously and he �rould life to remove them but seeks approval to add perpetuity to his Orders. <br /> Agent McManus had recommended the viae removal before the crista pruning because they were <br /> o thick in the field that he could not make a determination in which they submitted an NI for the <br /> vines but had forgot to include "in perpetuity'. The same protocols will apply which will require an <br /> onsite consult prior to any removal. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to close and Issue the Amended Order of <br /> Conditions for SE -2496 as proposed <br /> 12 Sharon Blakeman 11 Sa tint Pond Road) 10' x 12' Shed RDA <br /> — <br /> Res o u ce Area. Buffer zone to Top of Inland B ek <br /> Materiai submitted: Plot Plan— hamd drawn <br /> Sharon Blakeman is seeking permission to construct a 10 x 12 shed. There is no vegetation in the <br /> area and the only ground disturbance will be to dig ar few holes for the pilings. Agent McManus <br /> states the construction had already been started as Ms. Blakeman was not aware of the jurisdiction. <br /> Mr. Gurnee asks if the shed will require ar,building permit,and M . Blakeman answers that it does <br /> but she needed conservation approval fiat. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Legative Determination <br /> 7:15 ( lark Sullivan SE 3-2359 (318 Fled Brook Road) 1gees & construct ' deck—AOC. <br /> WITHDRAW I *Must be submitted to DEP on Superseding Orders <br /> Agent Mc-Manus explains that the original Orders under Graves which had gone all the way to <br /> Superseding order of Conditions and now the new owner would like to make some changes that go <br /> beyond the original work limit. The Agent had asked Mr: Sullivan to contact DEP and find out the <br /> protocol for this project. The Agent states that he could come before Conservation under the bylaw <br /> to get approval but he would rather him,go to DEP fiat because they are the issuing authority and <br /> he feels that the original project was very controversial as to where the work-limit should be, <br /> questions on the wetland and also the size of the house. He believes that Mr. Sullivan should go <br /> through DEP fiat and if they approve the Amended plans, it can then be submitted through <br /> Ma hpee Conservation as an RDA. <br /> 7:18 Viola Associates SE 43-2632Waterline Drive) Pool Shed and Partin—4N01 <br /> Resource Area. Flood zone <br />