My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/18/2010 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
11/18/2010 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 5:08:35 PM
Creation date
3/5/2018 3:09:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/18/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Material submittt ProposedSite Plan -11104110-Cape & 1.qc- <br /> ,inds EngineeringLandscape <br /> Shaer Residence Maffei Landscape Goran actors <br /> Jack Vaccaro from Vaccaro Environmental Consulting is the representative for the homeowner and <br /> explains that the homeowners would like to install a pool in the back corner of their property. The <br /> property.is on the landward side of the nearest resource area which is the East side of Great Firer <br /> and is well over 100' from the site but is within the flood zone. The landscape company did not <br /> realize that when they began work on the property until they had come in for permits and found out <br /> that they were In Conservation jurisdiction. The company thea stopped work and called in Mr.. <br /> Vaccaro to apply for a permit for an order of Conditions. Mr. Vaccaro explains that the only issue <br /> with this property is that when the house was initially permitted, the area for the proposed pool had <br /> actually been set aside as a "do not touch" area and again, the landscape company was not aware <br /> of that either when they did their clearing. Mr. Vaccaro asks if they could relocate the "do-not <br /> Ai Curb" area to.another area which is larger than ghat was previously designated. Agent McManus <br /> -describes the property and says that by looking at it, you would not have guessed that it was in a <br /> flood zone. The Agent states that he pulled the plan and saw that the area was supposed to remain <br /> naturally vegetated and explained it to the contractor. The contractors has a good working <br /> relationship with Conservation on past projects so this not something of a repeat offense or <br /> anything of that nature. It is alo'an easily finable situation with mitigation and moving it to a <br /> different location as the ground that was cleared really didn't have much for ground vegetation;just <br /> mostly spaced out trees and there is also no impact to the resource area. Mice Chairman Shag <br /> asks if a landscape plan should be submitted and.the Agent confirms that a plan-does need to be <br /> submitted. Mr. Vaccaro agrees and also m6ntions that they will be removing some of the <br /> ornamental shrubs to be replaced with good nature shrubs. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to Close and Issue pending receipt of <br /> landscape plans <br /> 7:21 .John Kelley (174 Captains Row) existing concrete & railroad tie retaining walls and <br /> borders and replace with interlocking concrete blocs. Replace crushed stone and sand <br /> walkway and backfill areas as necessary same footprint) RDA <br /> — <br /> Resource Area.- Buffer zone to riverfront <br /> Material submitted: Site Plan/Bak & White photos <br /> Lauren Lunbury from Cape Cod Construction Services is representing the homeowners and <br /> explains that they would like to replace worn out materials with better grade products. The <br /> proposed work is in the existing footprints with no removal of any vegetation and all work will be <br /> done by hand. Agent McManus states that this is your basic hardcape upgrade. The resource <br /> area is Marhpee fiver and there is no bank leading to the river or inland coastal bank. The work i <br /> approximately 35-40 feet from the BVW. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination <br /> 7:24- Bayswater Seaside SE 3-2635(108, 11 116 Shore Drive West) Bank stabilization using <br /> biodegradable sand-filled gags and fiber rolls — N01 <br /> Resp",ice Area Coastal Bank, Coastal Beach & LSCSF <br /> Material submitted: Proposed Bank Stabilization / SS Design <br /> Tara Marden from Woods Hole Group.is representing Bayswater Development and explains that <br /> the lots are in between Seaside Village and Tide Watch. The project is using mostly biodegradable <br /> materials to stabilize the bank as there are no other options for hard coastal engineering. She <br /> states that she has been working with DEP to come up with the design using this product. Ms. <br /> Marden states that the erosion at this particular site is pretty significant and says that last year they <br /> did approximately 24,000 yards of beach nourishment on the 250' wide lot. They have been <br /> nourishing for the last 18 or 20 gears but the erosion has been more significant in the last couple of <br /> years. She explains that the project i suitable to DEP and Coastal Zone Management of <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.