My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/15/2011 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
12/15/2011 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 5:02:46 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 9:59:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/15/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
y .. <br /> Agent McManus reads the DEP comment letter for the record which asks what the.elevation is of <br /> the dwelling. John Slavinski responds that the first floor elevation is shown on a different plan but <br /> as required is always Nigher than the elevation of the flood zone. There is no basement being <br /> proposed. <br /> Dere Hoiden is an abutter and lives on the adjacent let at 62 Bayview Road, and he states that the <br /> town bylaws call for certain setbacks such as; the dwelling should be 100' back from the water and <br /> this house i within 0'. Another town bylaw states that the Health Dept. has approved an SAS that <br /> i ' back but 100' is required. IIIb. Holden also states that the septic tank distance to the crawl <br /> space should be 10' but plans show ' and the SAS to the street requires 10' but is at '. Mr. Holden <br /> feels that there are a quite a bit of variances being set for this project and thinks that it will be <br /> deficit to the environment and the neighborhood. Mr. Fitzsimmons explains to Mr. Holden that it is a <br /> small lot and the dwelling is at the only place it can fit. There is a 0' separation between the work <br /> limit and the wetland; the Burd of Health is r vie ring the septic system,which Agent McManus <br /> onfirms there will be variances requested but-that is why the owner is going with the HOOT system <br /> which is'a very expensive.denitrifying system. The Agent also briefly explains the bylaws and <br /> states that the project is within the parameters of the performance standards. He also briefly <br /> explains the vista pruning bylaws. <br /> Marcia Holden, also an�abutter at 62 Bayview Road, also reads all the setback requirements and <br /> states that this project has.not met any. she feels that if this project is approved and the dwelling is <br /> "shoe-horned" into this small residential lot, it will send a poor message and destroy a lot of the <br /> Cape. Agent McManus feels that Ms. Holden was referring to all the BOH setbacks and he does <br /> not have a comment for that. <br /> John Slavinski from Cape & islands Engineering explains that the Board of Health will have a <br /> meeting where all the abutters'will be notified and illlr. & Mrs. Holden can attend.. Mr. Cook asks if <br /> the project will be before ZA'for lot coverage and Mr. Slavinski states that it was not required. <br /> Chairman Fitzsimmons asks Mr. Slavinski if it is possible that the Burd of Health will deny the <br /> project and Mr. Slavinski states' that it is always a possibility that any project can be denied. If it is <br /> required that the system gilt be moved, than the project will have to be presented to Conom with <br /> all the revisions. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to Close and issue <br /> 7:21 IVIG Massachusefts Nominee Frust **043-2670** (202 Daniels Island Road) Amend -2670 t <br /> m odif -permitted retaining waII and associated site grad ing.- <br /> Resource Area: Coastal Bank <br /> Material submitted: Proposed Landscape Grading Pian Cape & Islands Engineering <br /> Buffer Restoration Plan 1215111 Vaccaro Environmental <br /> Jack Vaccaro from Vaccaro Environmental is presenting for the applicant and explains that this <br /> project was presented several weeks ago for specifically a retaining wall and gravel parking lot <br /> which was approved thea. At this time they are seeking a change to the parking area which will <br /> also require a change to the wail and some site grading in that same area. Mr. Vaccaro explains <br /> that the resource area that they were concerned about was two coastal banks and the new revision <br /> shovers a small bit of the work is within ' but is in existing cleared area. Mr. Vaccbro also explains <br /> that there is a small section outside of Conservation jurisdiction and he explains that within that <br /> section, they will remove a. small hill and place a wall in its.place. Mr. Vaccaro says that they will <br /> need to remove a few trees but one Cedar will be transplanted along with the planting Of several <br /> others to create buffering. They would like to expand the existing lawn which they will use a native <br /> conservation seed mix that is intended for coastal areas. Agent McManus states that it is mostly <br /> cosmetic changes in the buffer zone and there are not really any applicable performance standards <br /> given the current state of the area. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.