Laserfiche WebLink
410 <br /> Comments on the discussion draft 31 -sa9R 19*o0 <br /> The premJ.se of the need for protection for the aquifer cannot be denied, the <br /> desirability of recycling is alis:s- quite apparent, however, the cost to the <br /> Towns to cry vith the regulations would be unaffordable,, In order to <br /> Satisfy the duds of the re lat ions asproposed.* without extreme f amc .al <br /> die, there must be some State aid given for land preparation and engineerem <br /> ing costs, <br /> If the alternst . e to landfill,-incineration, either by pyrotytic module or <br /> field type plant is to be considered., then too State aid must be forth coming, <br /> The form of aid needed in this instance will be both monetary and political <br /> in nature. The requirements for lain fill of the ash by-product of these <br /> methods should be spelled out in greater detail., Will the same soil re a. <br /> ration be needed, will grater monitoring be the same, is this ash to be conaw <br /> sidered as clew (chemically and biologically) or still a otent '1- threat <br /> The State should provide funding ass .stag-oe for regional or , sub.*reg .oral <br /> projects inclusive of costs for transfer statin needed to implement those <br /> projects. <br />