1/12/1994 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

■ Board of Appeals Minutes - January 12* 1994 20 r I # Friel stated that the expansions bave been confined to the construction and well-drilling company and the barbeque grill and propane sales, M . DiMaggio noted that the Building Inspector ' s citation had included legalizing the uses * Attorney Kevin Kirrane, representing M . DiMaggiojr asked that the Board find that Special Permit relief has been deemed to be necessary for the expansion.-of the uses. Mr , Maku-u . -- moved that the Board vote to uphold the Building lnspecto sa,-citation of Mr, Dimaggiors zoning violation dated Aug t 27e 1993 , Mr, Govoni seconded, All agreed. The Boar0cf-pund that Special Permits can be issued for the expansion-of - uses on the site. Mr , i it p. - said the special permit application f or the sale of prop ► .. grills and accessories was filed as an expansion • �. f .- Of the p �:e- isting non-conforming use. Mr . Peters asked if zoning wa ..g-oing to be changed. Mr. Friel explained that the off : . 1969 zoning map indicates business zoning on both sidiD.,55 of Route 130 and changes were made without notifying;-property owners . Malo,-,- -moved to take the application under advisement with the.' expectation that another application mould be filen for the;. ermit for the construction and well-drilling sin s ;P,-.•a d both could be combined in one decision. Mr. r Govoni.. % gppded# All agreed. - Drew y ,U.IL;yTrus - Requests a variance front Sections I4- and 174 cling By-laws for .A permis,s-I , t ' vary the setback and lot coverage requirements and to- rh. A'-.l u.--within the . # . # In an R-3 zoning district on prop~ y ltocted at 19 Tide stn (Map 126, Block 41 ) Mashpe' x'•.14 ( caner of recon. Andrew A. Harris ) . The varian , �,g :anted on this property in 1989 has expired) . Melt be s_, ting . J , Friel, M. Ma unas, E, Govoni Attorn; y.•:-_&- V-in Kirrane represented the applicant and explai- , 4.- gt the bouse had to be reduced in size and moved -rie.q.uIred by Conservation. Be said the owner was unable. . o,�•,r evelop the property due to the delay in ons erya.tzkqn approval which was appealed and the f inal decisi: s. ;a.s not issued until May of 1991 when the variance had exged. He questioned if it was necessary to have avian . from wetlands due to fact that by-law had been changed-,, Mr, Ma- s moved to grant the variance. Mr. Govoni seconded" • All agreed. r I 4 s I