Laserfiche WebLink
p g; + <br /> i <br /> rises appeciably higher than that and there really isn 't that much room M r here. <br /> Are you disputing the person who went down to measure the distances? <br /> RP:I 'm saying this could have been done in August, an_d,'-,the test pit was done in the. front <br /> lobcorner f the lot, nowhere near where the system is going.I would be concerned if I were <br /> purchasing a house there because of the high water lvl .Plus I wwn the house over here <br /> with a garage which is a foot or two over the foundation, above the road, rather. The <br /> road run-off accumulates on this lot, the catch basins don't do mmuch. This lot takes <br /> all the grater from 405,406 and from the top of Radcliff. Now where is the water going <br /> to go? I don't wart to run the r i st of getting flooded in the garage or basement. <br /> Mr B: The drainage problems fall under the purview of the con Cori, if building a house <br /> would impact the wetlands. Our concern is with the three variances requested.Look i n <br /> t Howlands report and the survey outlay, it seers the delineation of the wetland, the <br /> line that shows pits 5S 1 , 554, 553 were taken to show soil characteristics. <br /> CC; Rather than just examine vegetation , we did soil analysis as well . It-'s like a puddle <br /> if the edge of it moves after a RAIN, IT oESN"T MEAN THE EDGE of A WETLAND HAS MOVED, <br /> It means the edge of- the waterline has moved. <br /> RP: Ultimately, where is the water going to go <br /> CD: Ultimately it percolates back down. At what rate isn 't important. There' s a soils <br /> buffer between the wetland and the leaching area-. It will perc pervertically, not s.id w , . <br /> P: Flow does this affect shallow water wells? Basically all the water is running in the <br /> direction of that wetland. l express concern that theme will be three septic systems <br /> essentially upland from my well -My well was moved three t i'mes to obtain the best available <br /> water. Nay lot is 395. 1 have gone to great expense drilling and sampling pry water. My <br /> water quality is acceptable now, I 'd hate to see that upset by adding too many septic <br /> systems in that area. My well is downhill from the proposed septic system. <br /> GC: U fortu nat l y we all have that problem. It can't be avoided. I wonder in ray area <br /> how many more septic systems are cooing in. <br /> P: I 've seen typically in this area systems staggered diagonally, in this case three <br /> systems are in line, and I 'm picking up the shortest distance possible. . Most of them <br /> zig-zag, a pair of wells, a pair of septics. . . <br /> C:It loofas like he's tried to put the trench as far away as possible i-n the far corner. <br /> He's adding to that area but he's trying to seep it in that area. <br /> Mr B: Looking ng apt the flow lines the trench is at a 561 level , going down to 5 ' at the <br /> pond. The pond is at 491 perhaps. If the flow line is at right angle to the topography <br /> so the flow will be going in the direction of the wetland.The soil analysis indicates that <br /> there would no danger to the wetland b c'ause of the nature of the upland soil . The fil- <br /> tration <br /> il- <br /> trkadori from the leaching r% a w ould be downward, th r^ f rthere is no lateral prblern. <br /> This is on the Ia t page of (lowland's report. a dI . F f <br /> GC: I see the existing well on 396 is -in ,that corner, 3924 1s theme and the wel 1 that you <br /> proposed to put in is basically there. The well on 405 rust be on the other' corner. . The <br /> septic seers to be in the proper plc .That's the most logical place for it to go. <br /> RP: I noticed that they}haven ',t done a .perc test in th i as corner, it was done in the .front <br /> corner. <br /> Mr B: We will be conducting a soil examination at the time of excavation. Sometimes <br /> at <br /> R <br /> p rc test is done with full know l edge of w� re the system is going, other tires it <br /> isn 't known. once the plans arrive, i f the site of the test hole is awya from where <br /> the system is going, we require an additional soil examination at the time of installation. <br /> To race sure that the soil conditions aro adequate for the system'.If it isn 't adequate <br /> then everything will stop until a proper location i s found. <br /> P: I was present when they did the prc test and I recall that water was encountered at <br /> around 51-51/2' . <br /> GC: Here's- the pit on the plan and it shows that they hit water at 61 . <br /> CC : The quality of the soil i good, it's maintaining proper distance t groundwater <br /> that' s important here. <br /> GC': Mr. B just assured. you that before the sY steer goes in another h soil examination will <br /> be conducted. It will be inspected prior to backfilling by one of our i nspctr .So <br /> again we' ll go back.That again is part of the protection for your. <br />