My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/28/1987 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
12/28/1987 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:17:24 PM
Creation date
3/23/2018 1:56:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/28/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
p <br /> Mr B: We rust remember that this is aBOH hearing and that at some time this will have <br /> to go before CONCOM. <br /> CC: We have to go to BOH, Zoning and then we have to file with CONCOM. <br /> RP: Again we showed a difference of -12' of the location of the edge. of the wetland, <br /> in which case the distance from septic to edge of wetland might fall below the required <br /> o' . There is still a discrepency in the distance obsery d. <br /> 1r B: The CON officer went down and she reported that there was 61 ' from the corner o <br /> the lot where the leaching will be to the closest point of the wetland. So ther's a dis <br /> crepency of about ' there.The only way I can see to resolve this is to have your peo- <br /> ple from Howland meet with our inspector and to stale out what the distances are, since <br /> they are critical . <br /> And the drainage problems will be addressed- by the Condom. <br /> Mr B: U t i l -we get this information , e will continue this , and postpone our decision. <br /> CC: That probably won't be until the end of February since lowland is on vacation. <br /> Mr B: I think that' s the only way we can come to a conclusion. We've been up in the erea <br /> but it's still difficult to see what's what by looking apt it on paper. If there are no <br /> other comments , if your questions have been answered. <br /> We r 11 not i f you of the day of the coat i nuance when we hear from MR Costa. <br /> Mr B: There w i I l be no other hearing because we' 11 have a 1.1 the i nfo neccessary.. when <br /> e have that distance pinned down to within a 1121 . When we receive that info e'.11 <br /> male our decision at our net meeting. <br /> RP: I would like to state my objection to having the proposed set i e system within V <br /> of my property line. <br /> B: I also object. <br /> D i cu s s i on over Willowbend -- owner Mr. D. Hostetter. <br /> epresenting Wi l lowb nd:-, r. Jack- Largay,,Largay,, r Hostetter ' s partner; and Leone, evelo per <br /> o the W i l l obend L o l f ;Course wH i oh' has ce-i.ve . Planning Board and .cono approval . We <br /> 'I n - <br /> do have already f-i l ed a final E I to Mepa. one of the requests of the Planning Board was to <br /> release from covenant 2...I of -so that -vie cou-1 d convey thea to other parties. The Planning <br /> Board tools the position that they 'would p rm it such a release if we posted, a bond to the <br /> town of lashpee in the amount of $3.2 million. This covers the neccessary dev of the roads <br /> water and sewar ge -treatment plant. If the prroJect should f 1l flat on its face there <br /> .would be suff i c i ent monies i 112 times) to make sure the ori i s acc o p l fi shed. Mr Hostett <br /> met wl Mr Boyd and discussed the possibility of receiving building permits. I Im here <br /> to request of the Boli,, with copies of the EIR and breakdowns of the costs for the roads, <br /> treatment plant, etc , P d like to submit these to the Boli. ... <br /> lou 're looking for building permits <br /> L: Building permits , not occupancy permits. <br /> Prior to getting approval for the treatment plant? <br /> JL: That' s correct. We've received a preliminary groundwater discharge permit from DE E. <br /> That' s part of the filing with MEPA. The plant as deisigned will cost ca. $lMillion. <br /> We 're here today to leave this documentation and to ascertain whether we could get a <br /> building permit, not necessarily occupancy permits because none of the properties <br /> would be occupied until the treatment plant goes on line* <br /> Mr B: Essentially what you 're saying is that you're willing to proceed at your own risk. <br /> JL: lies sir, that's exactly what it i s. And the town is- protected with the letter of <br /> credit. We feel 'comfortable enough with the BSD representation that the plant will be ac- <br /> cepted. They've had numerous conversations with the Boli and DEE. <br /> Do they fay l.1 under that new permitting process's <br /> Mr B* No, .this Inas been in the worts since bf ore that. <br /> JL: It' s been at least a year since the first draft. <br /> I don't have any problem letting hire do it as long as I can get verifycation from <br /> all the other depts as to what he's said to me. <br /> JL: That's fine. <br /> GC: If noone has any objections, I don't. <br /> L: These copies are the planning board's, I don 't know as any othe Board 's involved right <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.