Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> -3- <br /> EM: <br /> -EAM: We're going against what the Plaming Board and the Board of Appeals requ i remrTt of a central we 1 l. We <br /> should not only clear 1t by DERE but also by Planning and Appeals. <br /> GC: OK, subject to all clearances, E M will check w DE E, Planning and Bd o Appeals. If DEE hays -no rDblEm <br /> ;th the lots in Sandwich being served by the central well in %shpee, I don't see as we would have a problen, <br /> would have no objections to the 19 lots in Sandwich. <br /> M: As long ais you don't expand on the Sandwich side and use our precious fluid. <br /> GC: We will continue this for two weeks to give us time to check on it. <br /> EAM: to LN meanwhile put your request in writingso that I have sa thing to send to DE E. <br /> APP II MET DAVID GDGGI 1 PE: PES EXTENSION TEARING. <br /> Perc originally done .11/18/86; extended once t i 1 5/18/8B; second request for extens i on' rece i vd 3/25/8B; <br /> denied pre j ud i ce 4/19/88. <br /> RGC: Why are you asking for another extension? <br /> DG: We fully intended to start building within the last extension period, however personal everts pre- <br /> vted us, Two weddings of our sons,.tether-in-law passed away.; ray mother just passed away, we' ve had <br /> other priorities. <br /> RG : one reason why we denied was the age of the perc, the other was the groundwater elevation at 10 ft <br /> which can change frr ,year to year. Conditions could be different today. Our pl icy-has been to grant one <br /> six r rth extension and no mre. <br /> DG: I didn't want to incur additional expense if i could avoid it. My plans are to get the house plans done <br /> and get al l my perm its with in the next s ix maths, assured. RLW ration to grant final 6 mths extension, <br /> second POC on the condition BOH witness soils at time of excavation and groundwater elevation. <br /> GC: MDtion to adjourn, second RL <br /> r <br /> EM <br /> 1 r <br /> ' ■ i F� F h <br /> * 9k � - <br /> #; <br /> � J rf - <br /> t <br />