3/7/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes

Home Browse Search

He has a 50% reduction. It is a two-foot reduction. But in his head it was four-foot, two-foot and 50%. He will make the correction and resubmit for the permit. He needs it. He has three-foot from the bottom. Ms. Warden came out and punched a hole in the back. They waited for a total rise. The figures are fairly accurate. They are basically looking for permission to install the alternate technology. He is recommending to his client that they engage Coastal Orleans. They have set up a division for monitoring. Mr. Harrington stated that he would approve the request as it stands. He hadn't realized that he had gone through Conservation already. Mr. Lantry was using a two-foot effective depth for the S.A.S. If he went to a one-foot deep field he could get another further foot away from groundwater. It was merely a comment because what they had here was in compliance with Title V. Mr. Lantry responded that if the BOH wanted to make this a condition of the approval they could do that. Mr. Harrington replied that what they have is in compliance and he didn't want to ship him back through Conservation again. Mr. Lantry stated that they were very pleased with him a week ago. They felt it was a great improvement over what is there presently. Mr. Harrington reiterated that the two-foot and the 500-gallon chambers are fine. But, if you have the ability to get further from groundwater. We would want to see that. Mr. Lantry replied that they are doing pumping so that they could do some mounding. This is below street level. They could mound this up and have the foot without any problem at all. They have the capacity. Mr. Harrington asked if Conservation made them go to a denitrification system. Mr. Lantry replied that they did not because they were beyond the 100' buffer. They were 143' to the shoulder. They had no comment at all. They thought it was a great design and to go for it. They 13