My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/4/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
4/4/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 1:17:11 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:15:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/04/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
was on the matter. He replied that he was for a total ban on smoking. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that he was for a total ban on smoking, too. Is the <br /> issue smoking or is the issue a safe environment? The issue is a safe <br /> environment. We are not here to attack the activity. We are hear to <br /> provide a safe environment. Is there a compromise? There is a <br /> compromise in everything that people do. They asked for public <br /> comment. Phone us, write, mail and e-mail what your opinion was on the <br /> matter. The BOH received 351 letters that were against a town-wide ban <br /> and 24 in favor of the ban. Out of those numbers 24 residents were for <br /> the ban and 90 were against the ban. The discussion continued for the <br /> better part of two hours until Mr. Doherty interrupted the discussion by <br /> stating that most if not all of the opinions had been voice. Consequently <br /> the conversation had begun to come full circle again with the same <br /> opinions being reiterated. He recommended that the public hearing be <br /> closed. He thanked everyone for coming to the meeting tonight. He <br /> appreciated their time and input. They will probably get together with <br /> the restaurant owners. Before the meeting tonight the BOH members <br /> had informally discussed coming up with a decision by May 4'", 2002. <br /> They are still going to shoot for that date. However, it may not a <br /> definitive decision. It will be something preliminary. In the meantime, <br /> we still very much would like the public to write them with their <br /> opinions and comments. Thanked them for coming tonight and will take <br /> everything under consideration. They wanted to update and review <br /> changes and regulations for a while. They certainly hope that it is <br /> something that although everyone may not be happy with. It will be <br /> something they can live with. <br /> Mr. Santos then responded to a woman in the audience. He had his <br /> whole closing speech but he wasn't going to go there tonight with it. He <br /> hoped everyone understood that the BOH had gotten beaten up in the <br /> paper. The article was put in by a special interest group - Cape Cod <br /> Tobacco. The BOH had an agreement with them that they were going to <br /> do a poll and get back to the BOH in a couple of weeks. Less than a <br /> week later they found out that a petition had already been filed in the <br /> town clerk's office to be on the warrant. This is his own personal <br /> statement. "My own personal opinion is the way the petition was <br /> presented to the citizens at the Mashpee May 2001 town meeting was <br /> not the way a conclusion should be reached on this matter. The <br /> responsibility for a total ban resides with the BOH as we are the <br /> enforcing authority. The article was placed on the warrant because it <br /> was a petition article and therefore by law it had to be presented to the <br /> public. As the member of the BOH I did not endorse this article. The <br /> wording of the article was vague and would not stand up to legal <br /> challenge. Since it was not put into the proper format according to the <br /> MGL. That was my reason why I voted neutral on it. I knew the other <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.