Laserfiche WebLink
position. But... <br /> Ms. Wa rden continued-that whoever is Servsafe certified is the person in <br /> charge. <br /> Ir..Doherty asked them to back up for a minute. He took the Daffodil <br /> Days as an example. IVIS. Heidi Trottier is the servsafe person who holds <br /> the certificate. But, she has nothing to do that with the Forty Niner's <br /> Concession. Let's say that nobody there has one. This is a "what if' <br /> scenario because according to the proposed policy that scenario would <br /> be possible. Somebody gets sick and an attorney gets involved. Is IIT. <br /> Trottier really responsible? She is net an employee of the Forty iner's <br /> Concession. Why should she take that liability or responsibility? she i <br /> doing there a favor and is not being paid to do this. Why take that <br /> responsibility?When the lawyers come looking for money whom are they <br /> going to go after? <br /> IVIs. Warden responded that if there was more of a hazardous type food <br /> such as the `ort -niner's. The health agents would require something in <br /> writing from the servsafe person. There is only in charge and they are in <br /> the Bahamas, Someone gets sick with food poisoning. That person in the <br /> Bahamas will ultimately be held responsible. This is part of the food <br /> code. <br /> Mr. Doherty stated that he has no problem with that. However, the BOH i <br /> allowing an exemption, a special situation. It is lousy that he has to bring <br /> it up because it is a non-profit thing and it is great for the community, <br /> But, he is trying not to leave any loopholes where they would have to <br /> deal with this later as an afterthought. That's all fine and dandy. But, if <br /> somebody gets sick and starts to go looking for money. Who are they <br /> going after? Do they go after the person who owns the property that was <br /> letting them use it or the concession or the person who holds the <br /> certificate or the torn Does the event need any special liability <br /> insurance? He appreciates the intent. But, he sees ar problem with it. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that in the food handling regulations it states that if it <br /> is a temporary event there is no requirement that states that you have to <br /> have a responsible person. <br /> Mr. Doherty continued that he didn't want to set up a situation where this <br /> person is volunteering their services as good will and then they get into a <br /> problem because we didn't foresee something. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that in this case they really aren't worried. He <br /> believes that there is some oversight. They are non-profit and they are <br /> 6 <br />