My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/11/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
12/11/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:18:20 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:45:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f i <br /> I <br /> denied even though this i different type of request, it is still the sane <br /> variance. To maintain your consistency you cannot allow it for one unless <br /> you are going to do it conditionally. The one benefit that he saw from this <br /> request was that it was a year round house and the bacteria are never <br /> going to die. However, with the seasonal usage they meed to know what is <br /> happening. It is also a matter of restricting people's homes. They would <br /> have to get into that if they got into granting variances for that request. <br /> The board in its consistency has denied Nor. Miller because of the denial of I, <br /> these ether seasonal variance requests. The state does allow for <br /> general use approval if the y t rnn does maintain less than 19 milligrams <br /> per liter total nitrogen and meets the other discharge requirement. They <br /> p . <br /> do drop the second year. That doesn't mean that the local board has to do <br /> that. Might now they have an additional requirement for the total nitrogen. <br /> He had explained to r, hiller that them are things that had to be met to <br /> _ <br /> grant a variance, equal environmental protection and manifest injustice. I <br /> there really an injustice here and are they truly limiting the use of his <br /> property? In his opinion, no, they were not limiting his ability to spend <br /> money somewhere else, It is an economic issue. Governor Weld said that <br /> they had to take it into account. But, do they have to solely base a <br /> decision upon thatl no, Whose are the two things. The equal environmental <br /> protection i there. They have fast system, ►phi h brings them above and <br /> ' - ihere <br /> beyond their equal amount of environmental protection. But, r <br /> manifest injustice? Are they in some way hindering the use of lir. Miller's <br /> property? <br /> Mr. Santos asked when the second year of sampling start. <br /> Mr. Miller responded that the second year of sampling would start <br /> sometime between now and Januaryd <br /> Mr. Bail suggested that they drop it to testing twice year. <br /> I <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that it be condition of their approva L That would <br /> be up to the board mer hers. <br /> Ms. Grady asked if they dropped it to two. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that they had dropped it to two. But, they had never <br /> dropped it for a complete year. <br /> Ms, Grady was wondering when that had happ tneda <br /> Mr. Ball responded that they would have to show some type of track <br /> record. <br /> Mr. Santo' state that the last time Mr. Miller carne in the board wanted <br /> 1 �.,.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.