My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/11/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
12/11/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:18:20 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:45:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r , <br /> Mr. Harrington agreed that if it was a passing system then he could see no <br /> reason why they would change the disposal at this point. If there are no <br /> groundwater issues. <br /> Mr. Ball reiterated that the change was the denitrification system. Now if <br /> you couldn't make ten but you get below twenty-five he would go long <br /> with that, <br /> Mr. sanicki reiterated that anything below twenty-five is acceptable. <br /> Mr. Bali responded that would be okay with him for now. He asked the <br /> other board members if they would agree with that suggestion, He wanted <br /> something there. <br /> Mr, Harrington stated that was the state's limit right now for the <br /> technologies that are available. Ten would be nice, but until they have the <br /> technologies that would do that they would defer to that figure. <br /> Mr. Halojoar asked If he would be grandfathered in if tomorrow they cane up <br /> with a ten. Might? <br /> Mr. Ball agreed and felt that that was meeting everyone's needsip <br /> Mr. sanicki wanted to confirm that if the system is over 600 GPD they <br /> were lookingt a denitrification system and the state level of a maximum <br /> of twenty-five.-parts per million, keeping the existing pits and a monitoring <br /> well down gradient* <br /> Mr, Harrington stated that the well wouldn't b that tough to complete. It <br /> loll <br /> was s nice and open there. There may be one out there right now. He wasn't <br /> sure. <br /> Mr. HajUar asked if he could ask a.question. There are two of the buildings <br /> that have a lot of usage because of the restaurants, one is 59 and the <br /> i <br /> other Is 37. The other three have one well below the 6, which is fine. one <br /> is 670 and one is 780. Was there a way that those two could b <br /> grandfathered in because it wasn't that much above the 600? <br /> Mr. Ball responded that they were both over 600 and there was no <br /> grandfathering. <br /> [r* Hajar continued by-stating that these were all theoretical numbers <br /> based on square footage and all. What if they actually had a water meter <br /> reading that was much, much below the number could that sway the <br /> board? <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.