Laserfiche WebLink
T <br /> Title V documents. it has nothing to do with the selectmen. <br /> Ms. Marden stated that the document has a signature page for the board <br /> of selectmen to sign. Ms. Warden stated that they had to sign the <br /> document because the town was donating the land. <br /> Mr. Dickinson added that it was his understanding that it was only the <br /> selectmen could give away rights on their land. <br /> Ms. Carron added that people who owned the land had completed all of <br /> the ether land aggregation. <br /> (the board reviewed the plans and documents for both lots.) <br /> Ir. Santos asked Mr. Harrington if he wanted the board members to okay <br /> his final review and approval of the septic application. <br /> Mr, Harrington stated that he didn't want the board to do that. He felt that <br /> the Habitat for Humanity had done everything that they needed to do for <br /> the land aggregation and septic designs. However, they now needed to <br /> forward all of the documents to DEP. He didn't think there should be any <br /> problems with the current septic design plans as presented. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that there are no variances. The board solely wanted a <br /> clarification of the land credit for those homes. <br /> IIIb. Harrington stated that they had clone that. DEP will receive a cop] of <br /> the approval letter for the Title V plans, the credit land restriction plan <br /> and the deed restrictions. That way the DEP will know that they had <br /> approved all of those documentations. He added that the reason why they <br /> held off on other properties was because the other properties weren't <br /> purchased until the approval was done. They actually had to hold off until <br /> they got the approvals. The DEP letters even stated that they were in <br /> substantial compliance. The DEP wouldn't even say that they granted full <br /> approval because the people didn't own the lots yet. They had to wait <br /> until they got approval. The properties could be sold and they were <br /> recorded when they were transferred. In this case, they were using the <br /> same part of the code but under a different use for the town as the <br /> grantor. <br /> Mr. Santos made a motion to approve the plans as submitted for 29 and 35 <br /> Sandy pox Drive and the grant of"Title 1 restriction and easement as <br /> delineated on plans submitted by canal Land Surveying 00152elated <br /> December 51hq 2002. Ills. Grady seconded the motion. Motion passed* <br /> 5 <br />