Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> entire subdivision according to that expansion. They have held each of <br /> the cottages with minor exceptions to maintain that footprint. so the <br /> whole project has gone forward on the basis of remaining in that footprint. <br /> They have tended to say that this Is the maximum footprint that any <br /> owner can build in. it was kind of to their surprise that owners chose to <br /> build within the maximum footprint. They thought they would build <br /> something small, so actually he had a (something) footprint size to give <br /> them as well. But, each of these lots where they have really located the <br /> driveway where the utilities are located everything is based on this <br /> footprint. Then main the entire village with the exception of this cottage <br /> and the last cottage has been built out according to that original design. <br /> You are looking again for some consistency here so that these last two <br /> units...these are actually going to be one of the smaller units. The entire <br /> footprint is 1200 square feet, which is net a lame footprint. It was <br /> amongst the smaller but net the smallest. It was consistent with the <br /> (something) project design. He was currently at the very end. <br /> i <br /> Ir. Ball asked if these were the last two. <br /> i <br /> Mr. Grotzke confirmed that they were the last two, He has asked for a <br /> continuation or a withdrawal actually on the other lot. <br /> Mr. Ball asked If he was withdrawing permanently because... <br /> Mr, Grotzke responded that they were withdrawing over a coastal <br /> variance e and modifying the system and looking for a permit under <br /> maximum feasible compliance under the same section. They will be <br /> adding denitrification and the IJV treatment as they had requested as of <br /> the last meeting. <br /> Mr. Harrington couldn't locate the letter from the abutters. <br /> Mr. Ball asked him to paraphrase the contents of the letter. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that they wanted to let the board know that they <br /> were formally against the board providing the variance for the septic tank <br /> to the property. They wished that the board would request full <br /> compliance. Due to potential long term impacts to their own property and <br /> potential for. <br /> Mr. Santos asked where they were located. <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that the abutters were on the side that was <br /> being requested. <br /> '17 <br />