My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/23/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
1/23/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:03:49 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:50:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/23/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
leach pits and connected those to the large house since there were three <br /> systems on three lots. He just picked two that were convenient and <br /> connected them to the leach pits. They don't even have...He didn't recall a <br /> promise to tie into the sewer system within a certain time frame. They are <br /> all agreeable to tie in when it becomes available. <br /> Ms. Carron started that 19 Ocean Bluff Drive has a denitrification system. <br /> Ms. Grandy suggested that they continue it and investigate it a little fait <br /> more instead of making a final decision tonight. <br /> IIr. Ball suggested that they could grant it and condition it, tee. <br /> Mr. Grotzke suggested that they grant it without the variance and they <br /> could somehow accommodate the system. <br /> Mr. Ball asked if he was withdrawing the variance. <br /> Mr, Grotzke replied that if they looked at his letter they were looking to do <br /> this without really requiring a variance. Title V doesn't word this a <br /> variance request if you going under maximum feasible compliance. If you <br /> look under that section it gives it,,.. <br /> Mr. Harrington disagreed and-Mated that it was still a variance. <br /> Mr. Grotzke re-iterated that didn't border...it doesn't mention it as a <br /> variance. <br /> Ms, Warden noted that the comments for 19 Ocean Bluff Drive notes that <br /> it needs affidavit for connection to treatment plant prior to occupancy. If <br /> you read back two years she believed that you would find this information <br /> on the conditions. <br /> Ir. Santos wanted to move this matter forward. He recognizes the fact <br /> that they are caught between a rock and a hard place because of the past <br /> approvals,, He understood the flushing from the bay issue. He wanted to <br /> throw a suggestion on the table. Would Mr. Grotzke be in agreement with <br /> thein that they require a denitrification and they will give him the five-foot <br /> set back? Thea they would do the research to determine if there had been <br /> a prior condition upon approval of a two-year limit for hook up to sewer <br /> treatment services. <br /> Mr. Ball suggested that they could leave it as it is. <br /> Mr, Grotzke responded that they were 2001 from the frail marker. <br /> 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.