Laserfiche WebLink
M <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> do an inspection, which would have failed due to the pit being in the <br /> groundwater. They are pumping the effluent from downstairs, the new deli <br /> all the way around the building over to the leaching field. That is five feet <br /> above the estimated ground water and above mottling. They did the peres <br /> to determine that fact. The variances that are being requested have to do <br /> with the design flow. The design flow is still below sic hundred CPD even <br /> though Title V requires that the leaching be 1000 GPD. It kicks in a larger <br /> system for Title v but the design flow doesn't full trip the torn"s 600 GPD <br /> regulation that requires denitrification. He asked there to request the <br /> variance to have the board issue that variance because they are truly not <br /> over design flog at this point in time even though the system is designed <br /> for more GPD* The property is in the Zone 11* They have 1.94 acres and <br /> with a 1000 GPD system because of nitrogen loading. They could use up <br /> to 854 GPD. That was truly what they are restricted to by the nitrogen <br /> I <br /> loading. 1f they ever were to increase their design flow over the 600 GPD <br /> to use up to the 854= They would trip the denitrification requirement. That <br /> was the first variance. The ether variance is to request net to put a1000- <br /> gallon grease trap in the ground. They are only doing sandwiches over the <br /> counter. There is no ether food preparation at the store., He thought that <br /> that was worthy of at lust requesting a variance. <br /> Mr. Ball asked if the flow was 440 GPD. <br /> Mr. Harrington reiterated that the flow was 324 GPD. <br /> Ir. Bail asked if that included the other store. <br /> Mr, Harrington confirmed that that was correct, It was twelve seats times <br /> 20 GPD. The blinds store is retail and retail is very small. 1t was 84 GPD <br /> for the blinds store and 240 GPD for the deli. It was a total of 324 GPD, <br /> I <br /> There were some minor changes that he found on the plan itself that <br /> ultimately led to a better change in the numbers. But, it didn't change the <br /> system at all. It changes a little bit in the pump chamber, <br /> ,i <br /> Mr. Santos added that the deli owner was aware that if he made any <br /> changes in the stere menu could quite possibly require the installation of <br /> the grease trap. He also knew that a denitrification would kick[ in if he <br /> went over the 660 GPD. <br /> Ir. Harrington stated that the owner of the deli was fully aware of that <br /> requirement it there was a change in status. <br /> Mr. Ball asked if this was noted on the plan itself. <br /> Mr, Harrington replied that it was noted lin the cover letter. They were <br />_-x <br /> 3 <br />