Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br /> A <br /> going to go in. They should at least notify them that they were going to <br /> have the sane problem when they go to repair their septic systems. <br /> IVIS. Grady noted that if they want to relocate their well then that could be <br /> their option and expense, <br /> Mr. Harrington felt that they should at least let them know. They prefer <br /> that they be tied into town water rather than to go for wells that were still <br /> going to be less than 1501. That would ultimately be a new well and why <br /> do that when town water was going to be available. <br /> Mr. McEntee added that it would be very interesting to see the results of <br /> the water quality, <br /> Ms. Warden noted that this was a horror show. <br /> Mr, Harrington agreed. <br /> Ms. Grady asked when they would get the water results back. <br /> Ms* Carron noted that it was ten to fifteen days before they usually <br /> receive the results. <br /> Ills. Grady suggested that they preface the letter to the abutters that they <br /> have Identified this situation as a hearth hazard. They were moving <br /> towards making this a better situation for everyone. <br /> Mr. McEntee re-iterated that the board would write a letter advising them <br /> of the public hearing regarding this situation. <br /> Ms. Garron asked if Mr. McEntee had the abutters addressed with him. <br /> r <br /> Mr. McEntee did have the addresses. <br /> Ms. Grady asked if they were going to aim for the date of the next meeting <br /> to have these abutters notified and a given a chance to respond. <br /> Mr. Ball asked how long the abetters have from the date of notification to <br /> respond to the board. <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that for a normal Title V issue it is ten days in <br /> advance of a hearings <br /> Mr. Bali added that the nett hearing was fourteen days away, which <br /> would be plenty of time. <br /> 12 /k <br /> r <br />