My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/15/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
5/15/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:35:23 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:55:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/15/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> s <br /> I <br /> thea it is required. If the property was pre-existing and it couldn't meet <br /> other criteria whether it be distance to cellar wall and/or sideline <br /> variances. Ho ever$ sideline variances do require abutter notifications so <br /> those will still go to the board because they have to have the green cards. <br /> That was something he would like to grant as long as they maintain their <br /> distance to the water main. Typically if the water main is on your side you <br /> couldn't go within ten feet of it, You still have to use that as a setback. <br /> That was something that they would watch for if they did grant that. Title <br /> , under maximum feasible compliance, allows to under " to wells. The <br /> board could actually approve that type of variance. The board doesn't do <br /> that because they have their own regulations. They won't be able to do <br /> that. They could go down to " also for coastal banks. But, the beard <br /> won't approve that. Those types of variances he would like t be able to <br /> grant and not have to bother the board members. This would also speed <br /> up the process with some of these properties. They both have a good <br /> handle on the types of approvals necessary for the 11A systems for both <br /> the monitoring and also the technical review of the systems. Again if they <br /> would like to change any of the regulations to the monitoring, such a <br /> seasonal usage, the board would discuss it. He didn't see holding people <br /> up for things that were pretty routine in mature. <br /> IVIS. Grady didn't have a problem with this request. But, she felt they <br /> should wait for Mrs Santos to be present before they approve it. <br /> Mr, Ball interjected that he had spoken with Mr. Santos. Mr. Santos had <br /> r called hien to explain that he couldn't make the meeting. He reviewed the <br /> two items that he was going to bring up at the meeting. This was one of <br /> them, Mr, Santos didn't have a problem with this request. <br /> Ms. Grady stated that that was fine. <br /> Mr. Harrington added that he didn't have time to put this all on paper. <br />"47 <br /> - IVIr, fail asked if Mr. Barrington didn't want to add emergency repairs to <br /> 4 <br /> his approval list. He didn't think that the board had to go. through the <br /> approval process. He felt that Mr, Harrington approved them anyway. This <br /> was just finality. <br /> Ms. Warden agreed with hires because the health agents threw in local <br /> is variances anyways <br /> Mr. Ball asked if they wanted the board to see the food establishment <br /> permitting. <br /> Ills. Warden noted that she had a question for the board. For example, this - <br /> ry 1 <br /> *'Sr"'a+jk• <br /> 1 3. <br /> ass <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.