My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/25/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
9/25/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:53:35 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:01:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/25/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Ball asked if Mr. Harrington had had bine to review thein. Comments <br /> Mr. Harrington replied that he had had time to review them and everything <br /> looked good. Essentially what has happened is that they were going to <br /> replace the FAST system that was there. It was not sized and typed for <br /> the type of discharge from the facility. Apparently, the FAST people <br /> looked at the original proposals and the restaurants were not on the <br /> original proposals. Now with the restaurants in there and the grease <br /> production. The FASB" system that was installed was not capable of <br /> handling that type of effluent. This high strength FAST 3,0 that was being <br /> proposed and approved by the DEP was capable of handling the <br /> commercial effluent. <br /> Mr. Ball re-iterated that they were upgrading it. <br /> Mr. Harrington concurred with Mr. Ball. He added that they were also <br /> proposing a now leeching facility that maintains the distance to <br /> groundwater. The original leaching facility infringed upon the five-foot to <br /> groundwater. <br /> IVIS, Warden asked If they were going to put it in front. <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that they were going to put it on the other side <br /> of the parking island. <br /> Ms, Warden only commented on that because at one point they were <br /> going to put it in the back. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that they were not going to do it. They had proposed <br /> it out by the highway. They weren't going to do that now. He did have <br /> some copies that could be noted on the copies that were provided to the <br /> board. They mainly consisted of typographical errors. The other one was <br /> that he had spoken to Mr. Donohoe, the consultant, regarding the distance <br /> to groundwater and how it was determined. If they looked on the site plan <br /> there was a GECI and GEC2, which are monitoring wells out by the <br /> highway. There was actually one foot and one half gradient on the <br /> groundwater. so basically within 10O' that groundwater was slopped, <br /> which is absolutely immense for this type of soil. He had only seen it one <br /> other place and that was over in Falmouth. The water basically freefalls, <br /> It got to a point and thea goes for 45, it was one of the breaks in the <br /> hydraulics in the +ground. You can actually hear the water rush through the <br /> sand. The readings were also taken in March when we had all of that rain. <br /> Mr. Donohoe stated that with the natural mound that was created below <br /> the operating septic systema They plotted the hydraulic conduit and the <br /> I'1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.