Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> t <br /> i <br /> always got back to them immediately especially if you requested anything <br /> from hires. He was very forthcoming with all information. <br /> [s. Grady asked if they had done any recent pumping records. <br /> Mr. Harrington replied that they did have records however theydidn't have <br /> that with them. <br /> Ms, Carron added that she had not seen them on any of lists that she had <br /> received to date. If somebody was pumping the system for them the <br /> company was net dumping it in the usual locations. <br /> Mr, Santos stated that the number of times that it had been pumped was <br /> one of his questions as rrwrelL His other concern was whether or net there <br /> had been any other discharge from the system,, <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that he hadn't seen any other breakout. The <br /> driveway had been wet a few tunes but he hadn't seen it cone down the <br /> street and almost get to the pond like it had before. <br /> Mr. Santos asked if it was still bubbling up out of the ground, <br /> Mr. Harrington believed that they were still having problems. <br /> Mr. Santos Mated that this was a change of ownership it was a system <br /> that failed. They had fourteen days to repair the system under Title V, Was <br /> one person notified or both owners by certified mail. Did the card go to <br /> just one person? <br /> Mr. Harrington confirmed that it did go to one person Ms. Abelli. <br /> Mr. Santos felt that both parties needed to be notified for them to appear <br /> at the nett meeting. Furthermore, unless this situation was resolved the <br /> board would entertain condemnation of the home. That might get the two <br /> parties working towards a resolution. That way neither one can say that <br /> they had not been notified or wanted to go through the lawyers. If they <br /> wanted an appointment to discuss this then fine it can be done at the <br /> net meeting. <br /> IIs. Grady didn't think that the current petition to partition did not suggest <br /> that they couldn't fisc the septic It has to be done whether or not they've <br /> settled the property issues. <br /> Mr, Darrington understood that position. However, the problem was that <br /> they could not get the money without a signature from both parties on the <br /> 3 <br />