My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/22/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
4/22/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:31:08 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:27:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Actually, number makes sense,, u can't fail a system and turn around <br /> and repairs Number two, they do that basically anyway. The water quality <br /> analysis report is something that the bank requires anyways. If they bank <br /> didn't require it, this would just back up the bank. It was a great idea to <br /> add a water test upon the transfer of property, she felt that they should <br /> have adopted it ten years ago. It was a positive piece of the regulation. <br /> Misers to bring systems up to grade for the old systems. This would help <br /> then out with the old systems that where way down deep with no risers. <br /> Mr. Sall asked if they were sic inches above the ground. <br /> Ms. Warden, stated that they would be sic inches below the ground. she <br /> continued by statim that in the driveways it was very important to <br /> determine if the system was HIO or H20, The necessary to uncover the <br /> leaching system was so important in order to determine how many <br /> bedrooms it was built for especially upon the transfer.of property on the <br /> Zone iI homes, she wanted that in there. The inspection ports are very <br /> important for the septic pumper to know where the inspection ports are <br /> for cleaning the system. The ground water elevation. It was normally <br /> denoted on the report anyways. But, this will make sure that it was dome <br /> for all of them. They've run into wells that were not denoted on the as <br /> built. However, there would be a comment noting that the well wai s within <br /> '. Was this the on-site well or the abutting well The remote camera <br /> they were having problems with these remote cameras. They were using <br /> them for just general inspections. Title V requires that you meed to <br /> uncover components within the system. The remote camera was net <br /> enough of a view into the system to be able to really give a good <br /> inspection. The only reason they would allow that would be if a driveway <br /> covered the system. Again, they were pretty much in agreement with <br /> these requirements for the regulation. Lastly, the "needs further <br /> evaluation" is not specific enough and requires a conditional pass. They <br /> did not want this getting tucked away in the files. They wanted the <br /> conditional passes fined. Usually it was no "T" on the system, There was <br /> a place on the form for comments on the bottom in order to list a violation <br /> of Title V. That way they can require that it be corrected, For example, <br /> p , <br /> there was an HIO in the driveway. It would be a conditional pass. Now, it <br /> would have to,be replaced by H20. It was not unreasonable. <br /> Mr. Ball asked the other board members if there was anything they <br /> wanted to add to it. <br /> Mr. Santos and Ms. Grady felt that the regulation was fine. <br /> Mr. Santos made a motion to advertise the Part 1X, section 14 septic <br /> System Inspection Regulation, Ms. Grady seconded the motion. Motion <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.