Laserfiche WebLink
F <br /> 3 y <br /> t. CPD. He did not remember what the interior seat number was. <br /> IIIb. Ball asked about the commitment for the barbershop chairs. <br /> Mr. Harrington felt that everything right now was documented as three. <br /> He did net find anything in the folder that showed an allowance to go to <br /> four. That was also and increase that was noted as existing,, But, h <br /> could not find any documentation that showed it being approved. That <br /> would be 100 GPD also. <br /> Mr. Bali asked about Michelle's. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that they had 65 sews and rated at 35 CPD& <br /> Ir. Ball didn't feel that this was the beard's responsibility to get the GPD <br /> below the 101000. He felt that they needed to communicate with the <br /> three groups, Carbo, Michelle's and the barbershop to cone with a <br /> solution by combining therm all or decreasing the seats through some <br /> type of agreement. They had already permitted each one. He felt that <br /> they should negotiate it somehow to get under the 10,000 CPD. <br /> Mr. Hajjar understood that Michelle's restaurant had been there since day Y <br /> one. There had not been any increase in flow after that magical 1995 } <br /> date. The barbershop had only been approved for three chairs and he did <br /> have four in there. It might be just a matter of enforcing that issue with <br /> him, But, for Darbo's restaurant, there had been approvals given for more <br /> seating after the 1995 and that was what the DEP kept saying. The DEP <br /> was saying that because they did that they had violated the law and it <br /> eliminated their protection as a condominium, As he saw it they were the <br /> ones that added on the seats illegally after the 1995 date. Michelle's did <br /> not do it. The barbershop should be enforced at three-chairs. They were <br /> really the ones that were the culprit here in his mind, if they could bring <br /> there back to the pre-1995 date that the system was designed for they <br /> mould solve the chole problem, The outside seating was on common <br /> area ground. He seat there a -day notice to vacate that area, as they <br /> had no right to have seating on the common ground. The problem he was <br /> having was that they were not volunteering to pay their share. They were <br /> on the common area ground. They've added seating after the 1995 date. <br /> He hadn't seem any flexibility on their pant. They wanted hire to assume <br /> all of the costs. <br /> Mr. Ball asked what the seating agreement was on the purchase and sale <br /> at the time Darbo's was transferred over at the time of sale. <br /> Mr, Hajjar was not part of that transactions tion. Fie did not anything about the <br /> { <br /> 5 <br />