My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/3/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
6/3/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:41:54 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:29:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/03/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Y ' <br /> t <br /> comments, she asked Mr. McGrath if what he wanted from therm tonight <br /> was for them to verify the sane numbers that he had from 1995, <br /> Mr. McGrath confirmed that that was correct. <br /> Mr, Bell stated that if he understood this correctly by 1995 Michelle's had <br /> , carb 's had 58 and Michael's had 56. Was that correct? <br /> Mr. McGrath confirmed that that was correct. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that the only change was carbo's and Michael's. Michelle's <br /> had not changed. <br /> Mr. McGrath responded that they used 1050 DPD that they could just not <br /> male up with the change in usage or being more specific to the square <br /> foot as far as other uses are. <br /> Nis. Warden added that Michael's was relocated over to a r -e istilng <br /> bagel shop. <br /> Mr. Harrington added that the aotu-al application requested 80 and the <br /> actual plan that was submitted requested 74, He added that in 1995 it <br /> was actually 18 seats, It was a smaller facility and was not increased <br /> until 1097, <br /> Ms. Warden confirmed that that explained the increase at Michael's. <br /> Nis. Grady asked if the board had granted extra,seats somewhere along <br /> the line for carbo's too. <br /> (The tape ends and l did not get Mrs Harrington's response to- this <br /> question. The conversation that took place included the possibility of <br /> determining the GPD with seasonal usage and the fact that the <br /> establishments were granted more seats through the approval of the <br /> annual food service permitting.) <br /> Mrs Harrington stated that the only time the DEP took into account any <br /> seasonal use was for the monitoring of the alternative sy tems. That was <br /> the only time where someone was not living there for sic months out of <br /> the year. They would decrease the amount of monitoring, something that <br /> he did not know whether they had discussed before with the DEP was to <br /> for water usage. He suggested the water usage because of the seasonal <br /> nature of the business. Typically if there was a set flog within Title V then <br /> the DEP pretty much sticks by that. It was a restaurant flow of 35 GPD per <br /> seat. But, the DEP had already one discount as far as going to paper and <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.