Laserfiche WebLink
S <br /> prior to Mr. Haj jar purchasing the property. He had said this before, I <br /> should not be an excuse to reduce the seating in the restaurants. They <br /> should not act on his request. They could go through and check their <br /> permitting at his request and find out what had happened. But just <br /> pp � J <br /> because he requested the board to reduce the sewing in order to meet his <br /> needs was„not their goal. Any action by the board to return to the 1995 <br /> design flows for Deer crossing he considered to be ill conceived due to <br /> the fact that two of the restaurants didn't exist in 1995. Even though the <br /> state could cone back and say that that is what had to happen, he hoped <br /> it would not occur. Mr. Hjjar should be asking the board to return to the <br /> 1995 flows not to the flows h e was requesting as fair as the permittin . Fie <br /> g <br /> should not be trying to meet his goals. He didn't feel that that was a fair <br /> request. He was trying to request what was permitted at that time and Mr. <br /> i Harrington wasn't in full agreement with all of the permitting that he had <br /> used at 58 seats. <br /> Mr. Ball aswould if the board b liable if they voted to return to the <br /> post March 1995 flows. What would those flows be <br /> Ms. Warden hated that every year they issue a permit application. There <br /> was a statement on the back of the application, which was received as an <br /> original document. There is a space to put the number of seats. <br /> Mr. Harrington added that that was the double jeopardy confronting the <br /> board right now. <br /> Ms. Grady stated that routinely you would have done it this way by <br /> checking the seating on the permit with wham they had. <br /> Mr. Harrington did not think that it had ever been established as a <br /> concrete number. That was the problem. <br /> Ms. Grady asked if they were each permitted for a certain number of <br /> seats. <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that the previous health agent hadn't ever really <br /> done that it should have been done, previously, Ills. Grady was correct,, It <br /> should be done, There was never a concrete do not exceed number that <br /> was ever established, When he was in Barnstable it was on the permit. We <br /> have a system now that they quid do that. But, previously it was not <br /> available to the health agents* <br /> Nis. Grady re-iterated that they had permits for however many seats they <br /> have right now. <br /> 5 <br />